Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sandeep Baburao Gorde And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 20 March, 2024

                                1                      1-WP-3134-24-pb.odt



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                WRIT PETITION NO. 3134 OF 2024
            SANDEEP BABURAO GORDE AND OTHERS
                            VERSUS
           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                ...
             Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. A. B. Kale
         AGP for Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. A. S. Shinde
                                ...

                                    CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.
                                    DATE    : 20-03-2024
PER COURT :-


1.    Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

2.    The case of the petitioners is that a notice of the alleged

Rasta case was never served upon him.       However, he received

notice, dated 13.03.2024 from the office of Circle Officer,

Astagaon, on 19.03.2024, then he learnt that Tahsildar had passed

the orders without notice to him. Thereafter, he had been to the

office of Tahsildar to inspect the record and obtain the certified

copies. He had applied for certified copies on 19.03.2024 itself.

He had also met the bench clerk. The said bench clerk informed to

the petitioner that the record and proceedings of No. Rasta

Case/RTS/1117/2023, dated 13.03.2024 was missing.           Hence, he

approached before this Court for staying the execution of the order

dated 08.03.2023 of Tahsildar, Rahata. His vehement arguments

are that notice of the proceeding was never served upon him.

Therefore, interim stay may be granted.
                                                                  2                      1-WP-3134-24-pb.odt



                              3.      Per contra, the learned A.G.P. submits as per oral instructions

                              of office of the Tahsildar, Rahata, the Rasta case was not

                              registered.     It was a special drive to clear the roads.               No

                              proceeding under the       Mamlatdars' Courts Act, were registered.

                              No harm would cause to the petitioners, if the special drive is

                              implemented.


                              4.      Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter

                              was registered as Rasta case.          It reflects from the notice of the

                              Circle Officer, dated 08.03.2023.


                              5.      A short point raised before the Court, whether the a notice

                              of the proceeding of Rasta case was served upon the petitioner.

                              Passing the order without notice is violation of principle of natural

                              justice.


                              6.      Believing on the statement of the learned counsel for the

                              petitioners, there is substance in the submissions.           Hence, the

                              following order is passed;

                                                              ORDER

i) There shall be interim stay to the order of Tahsildar, dated 08.03.2023 till the next date.

ii) List the matter for final hearing at the admission stage on 28.03.2024.

iii) Learned A.G.P. is requested to inform this order to the concerned Tahsildar.

( S. G. MEHARE, J. ) rrd Signed by: Rajesh Rameshrao Davane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 21/03/2024 16:19:28