Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Mahar Ali vs The State Of Assam on 10 January, 2024

                                                                       Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010280332023




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
     (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                  Case No. : AB/4170/2023

            MAHAR ALI
            S/O AJIMUDDIN
            R/O KIRAKARA (PART)
            P.S. SIPAJHAR
            DIST. DARRANG, ASSAM
            PRESENTLY RESIDING AT GANDMOW
            P.S. SUALKUCHI
            DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM
            PIN-781103
            MOB. NO. 9864027090



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM
            TO BE REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM



Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR A K AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM


                                  BEFORE
               HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

                                          ORDER

Date : 10-01-2024

1. Heard Mr. A.K. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Mahar Ali.

Page No.# 2/3

2. The petitioner has filed this application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as he is apprehending arrest in connection with Sonapur Police Station Case No. 261/2023 under Sections 379/411 IPC, R/W Section 11(a)(b)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960, R/W. Section 13(1)/14 of the Assam Cattle Preservation Act, 2021.

3. Heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State of Assam.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is owner of the vehicle.

5. I have considered the submissions at the bar.

6. It is submitted at the bar that the petitioner is not involved in smuggling cattle. The owner of the cattle has also submitted challans relating to purchase of the cattle. The case diary also reveals that investigation has progressed to a considerable extent and custodial interrogation does not appear necessary at this stage. The allegedly smuggled cattle have already been seized in connection with this case along with the vehicle bearing registration No. AS-25- CC-4819. The petitioner is a local resident and he has pledged to cooperate with the investigation.

7. Considering all aspects, petition is allowed.

8. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) with a suitable surety of like amount under the conditions that:

1. The petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer within ten days and cooperate with the investigation,
2. the petitioner shall refrain from such activities with which he is Page No.# 3/3 alleged.

9. On breach of any of the bail conditions, bail order shall stand cancelled.

10. Send back the case diary.

Anticipatory Bail application stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant