Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vijendra S/O. Gulabsingh Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra on 2 December, 2020

Author: V.L.Achliya

Bench: V.L.Achliya

                                                                    834.20ABA.odt
                                             1


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     927 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION
                               NO.834 OF 2020

                        VIJENDRA S/O. GULABSINGH JADHAV
                                     VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

                                             ...

          Mr.S.G.Chapalgaonkar,    Advocate   for    the
          applicant.
          Mr.V.M.Kagne, APP for the respondent-State.
          Mr.Rajendra Deshmukh, Senior Counsel i/b.
          Mr.Indraneel S.Godsay and Devang R.Deshmukh,
          Advocate for the informant.

                                             ...

                                         CORAM : V.L.ACHLIYA,J.
                                         DATE : 02.12.2020

          P.C.


          1]               On    an     apprehension        of     arrest          in

          connection            with     Crime     No.     0408        of      2020

          registered             with      Jinsi      Police           Station,

          Aurangabad, for the offences punishable u/s.

          406, 420, 468, 471 r/w. 34 of the IPC, the

          applicant             has    preferred     this         Application

          seeking anticipatory bail.




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                       ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                            834.20ABA.odt
                                                 2


          2]               Heard         learned          counsel             for       the

          applicant-accused,                  learned            APP          for       the

          respondent-State                and        advocate          representing

          the      informant,           who     has       been       permitted            to

          assist the prosecution.


          3]               In brief, it is the contention of

          the learned counsel for the applicant that

          the applicant is innocent and likely to be

          arrested              and     humiliated           for        no      offence

          committed on his part on account of false and

          frivolous complaint lodged at the instance of

          informant             on     account       of     inter        se     dispute

          amongst trustees of the trust.


          4]               It is submitted that on 04.09.2020,

          Baburao              Pawar,     the        informant,              lodged         a

          complaint alleging therein that the present

          applicant,             who    was     Secretary          of      Nisargadip

          Education Society, appointed 27 Lecturers in

          the year 2019 by creating a farce that the

          procedure              required        to       be       followed             for




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                              ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                            834.20ABA.odt
                                                 3


          appointment           has    been          duly     followed.            It     is

          alleged           that     though          no     advertisement               was

          published in daily news paper 'Sakal' in its

          edition           published       on       01.08.2019            still        the

          documents have been created to show that the

          advertisement              was    published             in      said        news

          paper        in      edition      published            on      01.08.2019,

          inviting application to fill up the vacant

          post         of      the     Lecturers.              So      also         false

          undertaking           were       prepared         and       submitted           to

          competent             authority             showing             that          the

          lecturers so selected are not employed and

          working in any other institution. By creating

          such false and fabricated documents approval

          of the University was obtained to appointment

          of 27 Lecturers.


          5]                In the background of the allegations

          made        in       the    complaint,              learned           counsel

          submits that the complaint filed is per se

          false         and     frivolous            and      nothing           but       an




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                              ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                               834.20ABA.odt
                                                      4


          attempt to implicate the applicant in a false

          case       with           a    motive       and    to      take       over       the

          control of the Education Society of which the

          applicant is Secretary. It is submitted that

          the applicant is serving as Headmaster in a

          school run by Saibaba Education Society of

          which          informant               is        the      Chairman.              The

          applicant is also the Secretary of Nisargadip

          Education             Society,          which       runs        Tuljabhavani

          Arts and Science College at Chitepimpalgaon.

          The informant is interested to take over the

          management                    of     the        Nisargadip            Education

          Society and in that attempt he joined hands

          with the brother of the applicant and raised

          dispute before the Charity Commissioner and

          change reports have been filed by the rival

          groups claiming to be office bearers of the

          trust. The matter is subjudiced before the

          Assistant                 Charity          Commissioner.              With         an

          attempt              to       oust    the        applicant           from        the

          management,                   initially           the      informant             got




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                                 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                            834.20ABA.odt
                                                5


          lodged          complaints          through          Mangilal           Chavan

          with         Kranti         Chowk         Police           Station            and

          Chikalthana                Police     Station              making           same

          allegations. Since the police have refused to

          take        cognizance          of        the        complaints,              the

          Complainant            Mangilal       Chavan           filed        Criminal

          Misc.          Application           No.1471            of       2020         and

          Criminal Misc. Application No.1578 of 2020 in

          the Court of Judicial Magistrate First class,

          Aurangabad, seeking direction                              u/s. 156 [3]

          of the Cr.P.C. to register and investigate

          the       complaints          filed       against            the      present

          applicant            and    other     members           of     the      trust.

          However, no such direction was given in those

          two applications. Since attempt made through

          Mangilal             Chavan    to    register            criminal           case

          against the applicant failed, the informant

          Baburao          lodged       complaint         with       Jinsi        Police

          Station          making       same        allegation            though          no

          cause of action arose within jurisdiction of

          Jinsi          Police         Station           to       register             and




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                              ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                           834.20ABA.odt
                                                  6


          investigate                the        complaint           against            the

          applicant.


          6]               By referring to allegations made in

          the first information report, learned counsel

          submits          that      the        allegations         made       in      the

          complaint are false and baseless. In fact no

          advertisement was published on 01.08.2019 by

          the      institution             to    fill     up     any      post.        The

          allegations made in complaint in that respect

          are vague and imaginary. On the contrary, the

          University has granted permission to fill up

          the      post        and    to        issue    advertisement               vide

          communication                dated            30th       July,            2019.

          Subsequent            to     permission              granted         by      the

          University, an advertisement was                                 published

          on     23.08.2019           in    daily        news     paper        'Sakal'

          inviting             application              for     the         post         of

          Lecturers            to     be    appointed           temporarily              on

          clock hour basis for a period of six months.

          It is submitted that as the education session




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                             ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                            834.20ABA.odt
                                                   7


          was to start from the month of June, 2020 the

          persons              already             working           were           given

          continuation.                  The     University           has       granted

          approval             to        those     temporary           appointments

          which were made for limited period of six

          months.          The       alleged           undertaking          were        not

          furnished            by        the     applicant       but       same       were

          furnished by two Lecturers, who were selected

          but        not        joined           the     post        after          their

          selection.                In     that        view,       there         is       no

          substance in the allegations made in respect

          of      cheating,              fabrication        of     documents            and

          commission of act of criminal breach of trust

          on the part of the applicant. On the basis of

          such false and frivolous complaint lodged by

          informant            to        anyhow    involved          applicant            in

          criminal case there is likely that applicant

          was arrested, humiliated and harassed for no

          offence committed on his part.


          7]               On       the        other     hand,        learned           APP




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                              ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                         834.20ABA.odt
                                                 8


          supported            the     order    passed       by     the      learned

          Additional Session Judge and submits that in

          order        to      conduct       proper     investigation,               the

          police may require custodial interrogation of

          the      applicant.           However,       learned        APP      fairly

          conceded             that    the    allegations          made       in     the

          complaint as to publication of advertisement

          in news paper 'Sakal' in its edition dated

          01.08.2019 made by the informant found to be

          without any basis. In fact the advertisement

          was      duly        published        on    23.08.2019          in     daily

          news           paper          'Sakal'         thereby            inviting

          applications for the post of Lecturers. So

          also the alleged undertakings were not given

          by applicant. Those undertakings were given

          by      two       applicants         appeared       for       interview.

          Learned           APP       further       conceded      that       in      the

          complaint lodged there are no allegations of

          alleged              misappropriation             of       amount            of

          scholarship             etc.         on     the      part         of       the

          applicant.




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                           ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                            834.20ABA.odt
                                                    9




          8]                Learned          advocate          representing             the

          informant              opposed          the         application             with

          contention that in order to conduct proper

          investigation, the custodial interrogation of

          the applicant is necessary. By referring to

          overall              facts     of       the         case,      nature           of

          accusations                 made     against          the        applicant,

          learned counsel submits that there is prima

          facie case to connect the applicant with the

          offence              registered           against         him.         It       is

          submitted             that     the      University           has      granted

          permission vide communication dated 30th July,

          2019,        to       publish      an     advertisement             inviting

          application to fill up the post of Lecturers.

          The          advertisement                    was      published                on

          23.08.2019. However, the appointment orders

          were issued prior to the permission granted

          by     the      University           to       publish       advertisement

          and       to         fill    up     the        post.      In      that        the

          procedure prescribed for appointment was not




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                              ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                               834.20ABA.odt
                                                   10


          followed             in    appointment             of     Lecturers.             The

          applicant             has    manipulated                the     process          and

          indulged              into         act        of        making           illegal

          appointments.


          9]               It         is      further             submitted              that

          although             the    applicant         is        not     holding          the

          post of Secretary of the Nisargadip Education

          Society, still he is posing himself to be

          Secretary of the trust. He has opened the

          account with the Bank of Maharashtra, showing

          himself to be a Secretary of the trust. It is

          further submitted that there is scope to draw

          inference            that        the   scholarship              received           by

          the       trust            might       have        been        misused           and

          misappropriated by the applicant. In order to

          conduct proper investigation, the custodial

          interrogation of the applicant is necessary.


          10]              I        have     carefully             considered              the

          submissions advanced in the light of overall

          facts of the case, nature of accusations made




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                                 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                           834.20ABA.odt
                                                  11


          against the applicant and the order passed by

          the        learned           Additional            Sessions            Judge,

          rejecting                the            application,                 seeking

          anticipatory bail filed by the applicant.


          11]              If the allegations made in the first

          information                 report           are          taken            into

          consideration               then    the      allegations            made       in

          the complaint confines to creating farce of

          publication            of    advertisement             in     daily        news

          paper           'Sakal',           in        its      edition            dated

          01.08.2019 inviting application for the post

          of Lecturers and filing of false undertaking.

          In      the          complaint          lodged,       there          are       no

          allegations            made    as       to    misappropriation                 of

          amount of scholarship by the informant.


          12]              So    far     as       allegations          made       as     to

          farce          being        created          of      publication               of

          advertisement in the news paper 'Sakal' in

          its edition dated 01.08.2019, learned APP has

          fairly conceded that no substance found in




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                             ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                       834.20ABA.odt
                                              12


          the said allegations. In fact there was due

          publication          of    advertisement           in     news       paper

          'Sakal' in its edition dated 23.08.2019.


          13]              Similarly, the allegations made as

          to       giving       false         undertaking,              no       such

          undertaking          found          to     be     given         by       the

          applicant. Those undertakings were given by

          two candidates, who were selected the posts

          but not joined the posts. In that view, the

          allegations made in the complaint found to be

          prima facie false and without any basis.


          14]              Thus,    on    the      face     of      allegations

          made in the complaint, no prima facie case

          exist to invite registration of offence under

          Section 406, 420, 468, 471 r/w. 34 of the

          IPC.


          15]              Perusal       of    the        order      dated         19th

          September,           2020       spells           out       that          the

          application has been rejected only for the




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                         ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                              834.20ABA.odt
                                                  13


          reason         that         there      are      allegations             as      to

          misappropriation                of     Rs.17,60,878/-                received

          towards              scholarship                and          amount             of

          Rs.40,53,745/- received towards grant in aid

          by the trust. The observations made in para

          nos. 16 and 17 reads as under:


                        16.     So far as the appointment of the
                        27 posts of the assistant professors
                        in      the      said      college           etc.     are
                        concerned, the original documents like
                        the proposal for approval etc. appear
                        to     have    been      filed     with       the    said
                        University        and      the     same        can      be
                        recovered        during          the      course        of
                        investigation from the office of said
                        University.       It     can    also    be     verified
                        from     the     office     of     said       newspaper
                        whether such advertisement was issued
                        at any point of time. It can also be
                        verified from the office of the said
                        University whether it had approved the
                        temporary        appointment            of     the      27
                        teachers for the year 2019-2020. For
                        that           purpose           the          custodial
                        interrogation with the applicant does
                        not appear necessary.


                        17.     However,        there     are     allegations
                        about receipt of certain funds towards




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                              ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                                  834.20ABA.odt
                                                  14


                        the grant in aid and the scholarship
                        to be given to the students from the
                        Government         and    its        credit         to     the
                        account of the said Trust / college in
                        the Bank of Maharashtra. The presence
                        of the applicant appears necessary for
                        the    custodial         interrogation           relating
                        to      appropriation               or     relating         to
                        allegation         of    its    misappropriation.
                        There are allegations that an amount
                        of Rs.17,60,878/- towards scholarship
                        and     an     amount          of        Rs.40,53,745/-
                        towards      the    grant       in       aid    has      been
                        received by the said Trust / college.
                        However, accounts for its disposal are
                        not    given       by     the        applicant.           The
                        investigating           officer          has    expressed
                        apprehension            that    there          is        every
                        possibility        of     fraudulent            financial
                        transactions.                   Under                     such
                        circumstances,            his            presence          for
                        custodial      interrogation               relating         to
                        same would be necessary.


          16]                It is very surprising that learned

          Additional           Sessions           Judge          has    rejected           the

          application to enquire into the allegations,

          which never form part of the complaint lodged

          by     the      informant.             Learned          APP       and     counsel

          representing               the          informant                 has       fairly




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                                 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                         834.20ABA.odt
                                                15


          conceded that in the complaint filed by first

          informant no allegations of misappropriation

          of amount of scholarship                         and grant in aid

          have been made against the applicant. Learned

          counsel for the informant submits that the

          above quoted observations came to be recorded

          in the order as during the course of hearing

          the informant has expressed his apprehension

          as      to     misappropriation             of    amount         received

          towards scholarship. In view of absence of

          any allegations as to misappropriation being

          made in the complaint, the learned Additional

          Sessions             Judge   should        not    look      into       those

          allegations and rejected application on the

          basis         of      such     vague       allegations           made        by

          informant            during     the    course       of      submission.

          The role of the informant during the course

          of      hearing          was    confined          to       assist          the

          prosecution. He cannot steps into shoes of

          prosecution.            If     the    informant          had     received

          any such information as to misappropriation




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                           ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                         834.20ABA.odt
                                                16


          of amount of scholarship or grant in aid it

          was expected on the part of the informant to

          have filed specific complaint to that effect.


          17]              The applicant has filed an affidavit

          stating          therein       that        institution          has      been

          permitted to run the college on permanent no

          grant         basis      and    the        institution           has       not

          received any grant in aid from Government.

          Learned              counsel    for        the     applicant             also

          pointed out that from last two financial year

          no amount of scholarship payable to student

          has         been         received           from        the        Central

          Government. On 29.09.2020, a request letter

          was sent to Central Government to release the

          scholarship for the financial years 2018-19

          and      2019-20.         It   is     submitted          that       if     the

          scholarship               itself      not     received          from       the

          Central Government, there is no question of

          same       being       misappropriated             by   applicant            or

          any body else. The allegations made in the




::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020                           ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::
                                                                         834.20ABA.odt
                                             17


          complaint make out no prima facie                                case to

          attract          the    offences       as   registered            against

          the applicant.


          18]              Thus,    on     due    consideration               of    the

          submissions advanced in the light of overall

          facts of the case, nature of accusations made

          against          the    applicant       and      the       allegations

          made in the first information report which

          are found to be baseless, I am of the view

          the        applicant           deserves       to       be       extended

          protection             under    Section        438       of     Criminal

          Procedure Code.            Hence the following order :



                                           ORDER

i] The application is allowed.

ii] The interim bail granted vide order dated 29.09.2020 is confirmed and made absolute on same terms and conditions.

iii] The applicant shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 ::: 834.20ABA.odt 18 directed by the Investigating Officer and co- operate in investigation.

iv] It is clarified that the observations made in the order are made for limited purpose of deciding the present application and none of the observations to be treated as observations made as to the merits of the case of the prosecution against the applicant.

[V.L.ACHLIYA] JUDGE DDC ::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 09/02/2021 14:06:13 :::