Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

T.Balan vs The Superintendent Of Police on 25 January, 2017

Bench: A.Selvam, P.Kalaiyarasan

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 25.01.2017  

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM           
and 
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN             

W.P(MD)No.1195 of 2017   

T.Balan                                         ..  Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police,
   Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police,
   Kundakulam Police Station,
   Kudankulam, Tirunelveli District.                    ..  Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to
grant permission and necessary protection to perform the Innisai Katcheri on
26.01.2017 at 08.00 p.m. in the eve of ?Arul Mighu Sri Mutharamman
Thirukovil? ?Kodaivizha? at Avudaiyalpuram, Tirunelveli District by
considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.01.2017.

!For Petitioner                 : Mr.J.Ashok

For Respondents         : Mr.M.Govindan,         
                                  Special Government Pleader.
        
:ORDER  

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Innisai Katcheri in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.

2.Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

3.It is seen from the records that on 12.01.2017 the petitioner has given a representation, but the same has not been considered. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.

4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the second respondent viz., Inspector of Police, Kudankulam Police Station, Tirunelveli District is directed to look into the representation dated 12.01.2017 and dispose of the same forthwith.

To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.


2.The Inspector of Police,
   Kundakulam Police Station,
   Kudankulam, Tirunelveli District.    .