Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Kamalu @ Rajammal vs Mani @ Nagamani on 3 December, 2014

Bench: Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, V.Gopala Gowda

  CHAMBER MATTER                                                     SECTION XII

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

  R.P.(C) No. 2481/2014 In SLP(C) No. 1350/2011

  KAMALU @ RAJAMMAL AND ORS.                                         Petitioner(s)

                                                VERSUS

  MANI @ NAGAMANI AND ORS.                                           Respondent(s)

  (with appln. for c/delay in filing Review petition and office
  report)

  Date : 03/12/2014 This petition was circulated today.

  CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.GOPALA GOWDA

                                    By Circulation


                          UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

The Review Petition is dismissed in terms of the Signed Order.





                         (Rajni Mukhi)                             (Suman Jain)
                            Sr. P.A.                                Court Master

(Signed Order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2014.12.09 14:09:44 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) NO.2481 OF 2014 IN PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 1350 OF 2011 KAMALU @ RAJAMMAL AND ORS. PETITIONERS VERSUS MANI @ NAGAMANI AND ORS. RESPONDENTS O R D E R Delay condoned.

We have carefully perused the Review Petition and the connected papers. We are convinced that the orders against which review has been sought, does not suffer from any error apparent, warranting its consideration.

The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

............................J. [SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA] ...........................J. [V. GOPALA GOWDA] NEW DELHI DECEMBER 03, 2014