Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

K.Ganeshan vs State Of Kerala on 3 December, 2018

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran, Ashok Menon

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                                    &

                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON

    MONDAY ,THE 03RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940

                          OT.Rev.No. 21 of 2017

            AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN TA 161/2014 of
                   AGRL.I.T.ADDL.BENCH,KOZHIKODE



REVISION PETITIONER/S:


                K.GANESHAN
                SREE GANESH TIMBER & TILES, NEAR POST OFFICE,
                ANNUR, PAYYANNUR , KANNUR DISTRICT.

                BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON



RESPONDENT/S:
                STATE OF KERALA
                REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT,
                GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001

                BY SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ, SR.GP

     THIS OTHER TAX REVISION (VAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD        ON
03.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 OTRev.21/2017
                                           2




                                   O R D E R

Vinod Chandran, J.

The Revision is filed against the order of the Tribunal, which confirmed the order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 47(6) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. On interception of the vehicle, which allegedly carried benin logs, it was found that the goods carried were in fact teak logs. Though the assessee had paid advance tax, there was undervaluation insofar as the benin logs being not as valuable as teak logs. The assessee filed a Writ Petition before this Court, in which there was a direction for interim release. There was also a direction for sending the sample of the logs for verification. The College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur found the logs to be of teak and not benin. There is absolutely no question of law arising from the order of the Tribunal, which is on facts and based on the expert opinion of the College of Forestry. OTRev.21/2017 3 We do not think any interference can be caused to the order of the Tribunal. Hence this O.T.Revision stands dismissed, leaving the parties to suffer the respective costs.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/-


                                    ASHOK MENON

dkr                                    JUDGE
 OTRev.21/2017
                                 4




                            APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A        COPY OF ORDER ISSUED   BY   THE   SALES   TAX   OFFICER
                  (ENQUIRY), KANNUR.

ANNEXURE B        COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE            DEPUTY
                  COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-II,  COMMERCIAL           TAXES,
                  KOZHIKODE.

ANNEXURE C        COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE KERALA VALUE ADDED

TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE IN TA(VAT) 161/14.