Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Manishkumar Tulsidas Kaneriya vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax - ... on 8 March, 2016

Author: Harsha Devani

Bench: Harsha Devani, G.R.Udhwani

               C/SCA/3696/2016                                                  ORDER




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


                      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3696 of 2016

         ==========================================================
                   MANISHKUMAR TULSIDAS KANERIYA....Petitioner(s)
                                       Versus
                  DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - RANGE - 3
                               (1)....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR RK PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
                       and
                       HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI

                                    Date : 08/03/2016


                                     ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1. Mr. R. K. Patel, learned advocate for the petitioner has invited the attention of the court to the assessment framed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to point out that while framing assessment, this very issue has been gone into by the Assessing Officer and has been discussed in the said order. It was submitted that now the Assessing Officer seeks to reopen the assessment on the ground that the long term capital gain and deduction under section 54EC had wrongly been granted. It was submitted that, therefore, the Assessing Officer seeks to reopen the assessment on a mere change of opinion and as such, exercise of powers under section 147 of the Act is without authority of law.

Page 1 of 2

HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Wed Mar 09 01:55:59 IST 2016 C/SCA/3696/2016 ORDER

2. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner, Issue Notice returnable on 11th April, 2016. By way of ad-interim relief, further proceedings pursuant to the impugned notice dated 25.3.2015 issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are hereby stayed.

(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (G.R.UDHWANI, J.) zgs Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Wed Mar 09 01:55:59 IST 2016