Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Parmila Devi vs Collectariate on 3 July, 2015

Author: Shree Chandrashekhar

Bench: Shree Chandrashekhar

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                     W.P.(C) No. 2987 of 2013

      Parmila Devi, wife of Sri Binod Prasad, resident of Harihar Badi, 
      Bilasi Town, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District Deoghar                   
                                            ...      ...    ...      Petitioner 
                                       Versus
      1. The State of Jharkhand
      2. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar
      3. The Deoghar Municipal Corporation, Deoghar through its Chief 
      Executive Officer, Deoghar
      4. The Additional Collector, Deoghar
      5. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Deoghar
      6. The District Fishery Officer, Deoghar
      7. The Circle Officer, Deoghar
      8.   The   Proprietor,   Vikramsila   Dugds   Utpadak   (Sudha   Milk 
      Production),   Sahkari   Sangh   Ltd.   P.O.   &   P.S.   Barari,   Bhagalpur 
      Dairy, Bhagalpur, Bihar               ...      ...    ...  Respondents 
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
                                      ­­­­­
      For the Petitioner        : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate
                                  Mr. Mohan Kumar Dubey, Advocate  
      For the State             : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A.
                                  Mr. D.C. Mishra, J.C. to G.A.
                                      ­­­­­


09/03.07.2015

  Looking   to   the   controversy   between   the   parties,   the  petitioner   is   permitted   to   approach   the   Appellate   Authority  challenging   order   passed   by   the   Circle   Officer   whereby,   the  application for mutation in her name has been rejected. 

Liberty is granted to the  petitioner to  file  an  appeal  within a period of four weeks and if the appeal is filed within the  said period, the same shall be decided on its own merits, without  being influenced by the order passed in this case. 

The writ petition stands disposed of. 

(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) Manish