Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Abdul Quadir vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors on 3 February, 2020

Author: Manash Ranjan Pathak

Bench: Manash Ranjan Pathak

                                                                  Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010273462019




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                          Case No. : WP(C) 8297/2019

         1:ABDUL QUADIR
         S/O- LT KASIMUDDIN, R/O- VILL- LAKHUPARA, P.O. GORUBANDHA, DIST-
         SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784506

         VERSUS

         1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.
         REP. BY THE SECY. DEFENCE DEPTT., TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW
         DELHI-1

         2:THE ARMY GENERAL
         ARMY HEAD QUARTER
          SENA BHAWAN
          NEW DELHI- 110011


         3:THE CHIEF CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNT
          OFFICE OF THE CGDA
          ULAN BATAR ROAD
          PALAM
          NEW DELHI
          PIN- 110010


         4:THE PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSION)
          DRAUPADI GHAT
         ALLAHABAD
          UP- 211001
          C/O. 99 APO


         5:THE AREA ACCOUNTS OFFICER
          SHILLONG
          MEGHALAYA-1
                                                                                      Page No.# 2/2



             6:THE COMMANDING OFFICER
              310PET PI ASC
              C/O. 99 AP

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR N AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.




                                             BEFORE
                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK

                                             ORDER

03-02-2020 Heard Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. A. Gayan, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondents.

On instruction of the petitioner Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of this writ petition with liberty to file afresh as and when fresh cause of action arises.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. Liberty as prayed for, so granted.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant