Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Ram Bachan Sharma Private Iti vs Directorate General Of Training & Anr on 15 May, 2023

Author: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Bench: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

                          $~15
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +    W.P.(C) 16336/2022
                               RAM BACHAN SHARMA PRIVATE ITI                      ..... Petitioner
                                                Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharawat, Mr.Ashok
                                                Kumar and Mr.Nadeem Khan, Advocates.

                                                    Versus

                              DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR.
                                                                            ..... Respondents
                                            Through: Mr.Shekhar Vyas, Sr.Panel Counsel and
                                            Ms.Neha Warrier, Advocates for R-1/UOI.
                                            Mr.Abhinav Mukerji and Ms.Pratishtha Vij,
                                            Advocates for R-2.
                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
                                            ORDER

% 15.05.2023

1. The prayer in the instant petition reads as under:-

"It is therefore respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:-

[a] Issue a writ of mandamus and direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to upload the marks of the 20 trainees [16 admitted by the Petitioner for academic session Aug 2018; 03 admitted for academic session Aug 2019 and OJ admitted/or academic session Aug 2020] on the NCVT MIS portal obtained by them in the supplementary examination held in March 2022 in respect of "Engineering Drawing" paper; and [b] Pass any other and further order( s) as may be deemed fit.

2. This court in W.P.(C) 16328/2022 has taken note of the similar controversy where respondent no.1 filed the counter-affidavit to bring on record the fact that the result of the supplementary examination has been uploaded. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1 Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:16.05.2023 18:48:26 -2- states that as per his instructions, the result with respect to 20 trainees/candidates has been uploaded but since there is no counter-affidavit in the instant case, therefore, it cannot be presumed that the respondents have uploaded the result of the supplementary examination.

3. However, under the facts of the present case, this court finds it appropriate to direct respondent no.1 to upload the result of the supplementary examination within a period of 7 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order., if not already done. However, if for any reason, the same cannot possibly be done, let a reasoned order in that respect be passed and be also communicated to the petitioner to enable him to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition stands disposed of.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 15, 2023/MJ Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRATIMA Signing Date:16.05.2023 18:48:26