Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Ranganathan vs Union Of India on 24 September, 2019

Author: M.Sathyanarayanan

Bench: M.Sathyanarayanan

                                                                                  WP.No.28139/2019

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED 24.09.2019

                                                      CORAM

                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN

                                                        AND

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

                                               WP.No.28139/2019

                   M.Ranganathan                                            ..          Petitioner

                                                      Versus

                   1.Union of India
                     represented by the Secretary
                     Ministry of Law and Justice
                     Department of Legal Affairs
                     Sastri Bhavan, New Delhi.

                   2.Ministry of Education
                     represented by the Chief Secretary
                     New Delhi.

                   3.The State of Tamil Nadu
                     represented by Chief Secretary
                     Fort St George, Secretariat
                     Chennai 600 009.

                   4.The Secretary
                     Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Education Department,
                     Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.                        ..      Respondents

                   Prayer:-    Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                   praying for a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the

                   1/6
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                    WP.No.28139/2019

                   representation dated 09.09.2019 sent by the petitioner and direct the
                   respondents to appropriate action to celebrate Gandhi Jayanthi on 2nd
                   October in every year by way of propagating Gandhiji's ideologies within a
                   stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.


                                          For Petitioner     :      Mr.M.Saravanan for
                                                                    Mr.C.Veerarahavan
                                          For R1             :      Mr.G.Karthikeyan
                                                                    Assistant Solicitor General
                                          For R4             :      Mr.C.Munusamy, Spl.GP [Edn]


                                                           ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J.,] (1)By consent, the writ petition, styled as a Public Interest Litigation, is taken up for final disposal. Mr.G.Karthikeyan, learned Assistant Solicitor General accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.C.Munusamy, learned special Government Pleader [Education] accepts notice on behalf of the 4th respondent. Notices to respondents 2 and 3 are not necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case. (2)The petitioner claims to be a Public Interest Litigant and also the Founder and Managing Trustee of Mahatma Gandhi Ashram, Anaimalai, Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu and came forward to file this writ petition styled as a Public Interest Litigation, stating among other things that on the birthday of the one of the greatest Leaders, viz., Mohandoss 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in WP.No.28139/2019 Karamchand Gandhi, the public holiday is declared and the sacrifice made by the great leader have not been brought to their knowledge and in order to create awareness in the mind of people, functions are to be conducted and it is also his endeavour that all institutions like Schools, Colleges, Government Offices and Corporate Institutions in the Country should also celebrate Gandhi Jayanthi on 2nd of October every year. The petitioner, in this regard, has also submitted two representations dated 07.09.2019 and 09.09.2019 respectively, to the Hon'ble President of India as well as to the Hon'ble Prime Minister with copies marked to the concerned official respondents and despite receipt and acknowledgment, no response is forth coming and hence, came forward to file the present writ petition.

(3)Mr.C.Munusamy, learned Special Government Pleader [Education] appearing for the 4th respondent has invited the attention of this Court to the proceedings of the State Level Directorate of Integrated School Education, State Level Projects dated 09.09.2019 in Na.Ka.No.680/m1/xgf//2019 and would submit that elaborate instructions have already been issued to the Schools as to the performance/conducting of the functions relating to Gandhi Jayanthi and hence, prays for appropriate orders.

3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in WP.No.28139/2019 (4)This Court has considered the rival submissions and also perused the materials placed before it.

(5)This Court is not exercising any advisory jurisdiction and therefore, it cannot issue any positive direction as to how the Corporate Sector should also celebrate Gandhi Jayanthi functions. The above cited proceedings of the State Level Directorate of Integrated School Education, State Level Projects dated 09.09.2019 would disclose that elaborate guidelines / directions have been issued to the Schools, coming under the said Directorate and it would also disclose that functions relating to celebrations of Gandhi Jayanthi would start at 23.09.2019 and ends on 02.10.2019 – on the birthday of the great soul. Since elaborate guidelines have already been issued by the said Directorate as to the conducting of the functions in the schools attached to the said Directorate and also the fact that in the absence of any infraction / non-compliance of the statutory duty, this Court cannot issue any positive direction as to the prayer sought for by the petitioner.

(6)This Court is not in a position to come to the aid of the petitioner.

However, taking into consideration of the fact the above cited proceedings of the State Level Directorate of Integrated School Education, State Level Projects dated 09.09.2019, the Directorate of School and Collegiate 4/6 http://www.judis.nic.in WP.No.28139/2019 Education, may also make an endeavour to celebrate Gandhi Jayanthi, so as to spread awareness of the sacrifice made by the great soul. (7)The writ petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs.

                                                                               [MSNJ]     [NSSJ]
                                                                                  24.09.2019
                   Internet           : Yes
                   AP
                   To
                   1.The Secretary, Union of India
                     Ministry of Law and Justice
                     Department of Legal Affairs
                     Sastri Bhavan, New Delhi.

                   2.The Chief Secretary,
                     Ministry of Education,
                     New Delhi.

                   3.The Chief Secretary
                     State of Tamil Nadu
                     Fort St George, Secretariat,
                     Chennai 600 009.

                   4.The Secretary
                     Government of Tamil Nadu
                     Education Department,
                     Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.

COPY To:- The Directorate of School and Collegiate Education, 9th Floor, EVK Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in WP.No.28139/2019 M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., AND N.SESHASAYEE, J., AP WP.No.28139/2019 24.09.2019 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in