Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Shokatali Barkatali Hemani vs State Of Gujarat & on 23 December, 2014

Author: Abhilasha Kumari

Bench: Abhilasha Kumari

         C/SCA/18564/2014                                ORDER



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18564 of 2014

================================================================
              SHOKATALI BARKATALI HEMANI....Petitioner(s)
                              Versus
                STATE OF GUJARAT & 1....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MS. KRUTI M SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA
               KUMARI

                            Date : 23/12/2014


                             ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Ms.Kruti M. Shah, learned advocate for  the petitioner. 

2. It   is   submitted   that   the   petitioner   has  approached   this   Court   without   availing   of   the  alternative   remedy   for   the   reason   that   no  opportunity   of   hearing   has   been   granted   to   him  before   the   impugned   order   has   been   passed,  therefore, the principles of natural justice have  been violated.

3. It is further submitted that the proceedings  carried   out   by   the   respondents   against   the  petitioner   show an  utter  lack of  application  of  Page 1 of 3 C/SCA/18564/2014 ORDER mind,   inasmuch   as   the   notice   issued   to   the  petitioner   is   dated   12.12.2014,   whereas,   the  impugned order has been passed a day earlier i.e.  on   11.12.2014.     It   is   further   submitted   that  though   the   impugned   order   has   been   passed   on  11.12.2014, which date is reflected in the first  paragraph thereof, however, the last page of the  order   reflects   the   date   as   17.09.2014.     Hence,  the   proceedings   against   the   present   petitioner  are not legally sustainable.

4. Learned   advocate   for   the   petitioner   further  submits   that   without   prejudice   to   the   above  contentions,  the  petitioner  is ready  to pay  the  amount   of   penalty   to   the   respondents   for   the  overloading of the vehicle.  

5. Issue   Notice   for   final   disposal,   returnable  on 19.01.2015.  

6. By way of ad­interim relief, it is directed  that   the   respondents   shall   not   take   any   action  pursuant to the order dated 11.12.2014, passed by  the respondent No.2.  

7. In   addition   to   the   normal   mode   of   service,  direct service is also permitted. 

Page 2 of 3 C/SCA/18564/2014 ORDER

(SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.) ANKIT Page 3 of 3