Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S R.P. Jewellers vs Indian Overseas Bank on 11 March, 2016

Author: Arun Palli

Bench: Arun Palli

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH



                                           Civil Writ Petition No.4642 of 2016 (O&M)
                                          DATE OF DECISION: 11.03.2016

                M/s R.P. Jewellers
                                                                       .....Petitioner
                                                 versus

                Indian Overseas Bank, Ludhiana
                                                                    .....Respondents



                CORAM:-         HON'BLE MR. S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI


                Present:        Ms. Anjali Khosla, Advocate for the petitioner
                                     ..

S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE: (Oral) The petitioner availed a loan from the respondent- bank. Its grievance in this petition is that the respondent- bank wrongly accepted the collateral security created by the mother of the sole proprietor of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner seeks return of the title deed of the property which allegedly belongs to the mother of the sole proprietor of the petitioner. The petitioner, therefore, has no cause of action. The cause of action, if any, vests with the mother of the sole proprietor of the petitioner, who created the collateral security. Even if the collateral security was illegally created, she is the only person who is entitled to apply for the documents to be returned. PARKASH CHAND 2016.03.15 14:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

                 CWP-4642-2016                                                           - 2 -



                3.               The   petition   is,    therefore,    dismissed   as   not

maintainable. Needless to clarify that the mother of the sole proprietor is always at liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings for return of the documents.




                                                              (S.J. VAZIFDAR)
                                                            ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE



                11.03.2016                                         (ARUN PALLI)
                Neenu/parkash*                                         JUDGE




PARKASH CHAND
2016.03.15 14:09
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document