Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

C.Mohanraj vs M/S.Deepak Traders on 6 February, 2025

Author: P.T.Asha

Bench: P.T.Asha

                                                                                 C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

                                             DATED: 06.02.2025

                                                      CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                         C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025
                                         and C.M.P.No.2028 of 2025


                     C.Mohanraj                                                           ...Petitioner

                                                            Vs

                     1 M/s.Deepak Traders
                       Through its Partner, Madan Gopal Hedda
                       carrying business at Market Road, Sedam
                       Gulbarga District, Karnataka State.

                     2 M/s.Prakash Traders
                       Through its partner, Satyanarayan Hedda
                       Carrying business at Market Road, Sedam
                       Gulbarga District, Karnataka State.

                     3 M/s.Saroj Agency,
                       Through its partner, Madan Gopal Hedda
                       Carrying business at Market Road, Sedam
                       Gulbarga District, Karnataka State.

                     4 A.J.Suresh Kumar
                       S/o. A. Jayapal, Door No.1, Kullappa Street
                       Dadagapatty Salem - 006.

                     1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis            ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm )
                                                                                C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025



                     5 M/s.Hari Narayanan Nathabal Kabra,
                       Market Road, Sedam, Gulbarga District
                       Karnataka State.

                     6 M/s.Kabra Commercial Agency,
                       Market Road, Sedam, Gulbarga District
                       Karnataka State.

                     7 M/s.Sriram Traders,
                       Market Road, Sedam, Gulbarga District
                       Karnataka State.

                     8 M/s.Chandrakant Dindure and Arjum
                       Solapur Jaya Raj, Canvasing Agent, Solapur
                       Solapur District, Maharashtra State.

                     9 M/s.Vijayalakshmi Traders,
                       No. 1564 Main Road, Maindargi, Akkalkot Taluk,
                       Solapur District, Maharashtra State.

                     10. M/s.Mailarlingeshwar Traders,
                        Bijapur Road, Indira Nagar Taluk,
                        Solapur District, Maharashtra State.

                     11. M/s. Thirumurugan Stores,
                        No.358, Rangai Gounder Street, Coimbatore.

                     12. N.G.Venkatesan Chettiar,

                     13. Pugal

                     14. Subramani


                     2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis           ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm )
                                                                               C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025



                     15. Ramachandran

                     16. Prabu and Co.,
                         Aku Dal Mill,
                         Vathiyar Kallam Sandu,
                         Suramangalam Main Road,
                         Salem.

                     17. Mohan

                     18. Senthil

                     19.Ganesan

                     20.Senthil

                     21. M/s.Annai Traders,
                        Tiruppur Main Road, Palladam,
                       Tirupur District.

                     22.M/s.Abirami Traders,
                        Kovai Road, Mettupalayam.

                     23.M/s.Annai Traders,
                        Palladam Main Road, Sullur,
                       Tiruppur District.

                     24. M/s. Gupta Traders,
                        Rangai Gounder Street, Coimbatore.

                     25. M/s.Radha Traders,
                        Market Road, Erode.


                     3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis          ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm )
                                                                                       C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025



                     26. M/s.Nanbargal Maligai,
                        Bazaar Street, Tiruppur.

                     27. Lalitha Viswanathan                                               ...Respondents

                     PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filled under Article 227 of
                     Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order dated
                     11.11.2024 made in I.A.No.73 of 2018 in I.P.No.29 of 2024 on the
                     file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem and allow the above
                     revision.


                                       For Petitioner                 : Ms.P.Veena Suresh


                                                           ORDER

The petitioner herein seeks to challenge the order passed in I.A.No.73 of 2018 in I.P.No.29 of 2014 dated 11.11.2024 wherein he has been impleaded as the 26th respondent in I.P.No.29 of 2024.

2. I.A.No.73 of 2018 has been filed by the respondents 1 to 3 seeking to implead the petitioner herein in I.P.No.29 of 2014. The 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm ) C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025 insolvency proceedings has been filed by the debtor himself/4th respondent herein. In the implead petition, the respondents 1 to 3 /petitioners would contend that they had filed I.A.No.17 of 2015 seeking amendment of the original counter by adding a counter claim and the same was allowed by this Court on 10.08.2015. In the counter claim, the respondents 1 to 3 have sought the relief to declare the transfer of property by the 4th respondent herein by virtue of Sale Deed dated 14.07.2014 as fraudulent. The said sale deed has been executed in favour of the revision petitioner herein. Therefore, they would contend that he is a necessary party to the proceedings.

3. A counter statement has been filed by the revision petitioner /26th respondent stating that he is a bonafide purchaser for value and that he had spent huge sums of money to improve the property. He would submit that he is in absolute possession and enjoyment of the same. He would further submit that he is unaware of the transactions between the respondents 1 to 3 and the 4th respondent 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm ) C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025 herein. The revision petitioner would contend that he had purchased the property on 14.07.2014 and the counter claim has been filed on 10.08.2015. Therefore, the counter claim itself is barred by limitation and he is not a necessary party. The learned Principal Subordinate Judge, taking into consideration the fact that the relief which is claimed would have a direct impact on the revision petitioner, had allowed the application. Challenging the same, the revision petitioner is before this Court.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

4. A perusal of the records would show that the respondents 1 to 3 in the insolvency proceedings have filed a counter claim and the relief in the counter claim is to set aside the Sale Deed that has been executed by the 4th respondent herein in the insolvency proceedings in favour of the revision petitioner. Any decision taken in the 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm ) C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025 counter claim would have a direct impact on the revision petitioner. Therefore, he is a proper and necessary party to the proceedings and the Court is at a loss to understand as to why there is a challenge to the order which is only for the benefit of the revision petitioner so as to ensure that no orders are passed behind his back. I see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.02.2025 Index: yes/no Speaking Order: Yes/No srn To The Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm ) C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025 P.T.ASHA, J.

srn C.R.P. (PD) No. 311 of 2025 06.02.2025 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2025 02:12:16 pm )