Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Bombay High Court

Prashant Prabhakar Gavali vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 11 February, 2019

Author: Sunil P. Deshmukh

Bench: Sunil P. Deshmukh

                                             1          Writ Petition No. 1937/2019+group


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY,
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     56. WRIT PETITION NO.1937 of 2019
                                   WITH
                    62. WRIT PETITION NO.1956 OF 2019
                  WITH WP/1957/2019 WITH WP/1958/2019
                  WITH WP/1959/2019 WITH WP/1960/2019
                  WITH WP/1961/2019 WITH WP/1962/2019
                  WITH WP/1963/2019 WITH WP/1964/2019
                  WITH WP/1965/2019 WITH WP/1966/2019

 Babita W/o Balaji Bondar                                         ...Petitioner
          VERSUS
 The State of Maharashtra and others                              ...Respondents


 Mr. Sachin S. Bhise, Advocate for petitioners in all petitions
 Mr. S.N. Kendre, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondents No.1 to 3


                                        CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
                                        DATE         : 11 th February, 2019
 ORDER:

1. Issue notice to respondents, returnable on 25 th February, 2019.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice for respondents No. 1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for petitioners urges for interim relief stating that the properties have been in possession of petitioners under valid transaction for over 25 to 30 years and those have been developed with due permission of local authority. Pursuant to orders by this court in a writ petition purportedly the matter ::: Uploaded on - 13/02/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 13/02/2019 23:40:30 ::: 2 Writ Petition No. 1937/2019+group was supposed to be inquired, however, in violation of principles of natural justice, impugned orders have been passed directing removal of structure standing over the properties. He submits that there is grave apprehension that the orders would be implemented.

4. Having regard to aforesaid, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause "C" till the returnable date.

5. In addition to service through court process, petitioners shall serve respondent No.4 by any legally acceptable private mode of service and file affidavit along with tangible proof to that effect within a period of one week before returnable date. In case of failure to serve respondent No.4 privately and file affidavit as directed before returnable date, ad-interim relief, as has been granted, would cease to operate.

6. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the subject matter involved in present writ petition is the same as involved in group of writ petitions bearing no. 1132 of 2019 and companion matters. As such, present matters as well be placed alongwith said group of petitions on 25th February, 2019.

( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ) JUDGE.

Madkar ::: Uploaded on - 13/02/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 13/02/2019 23:40:30 :::