Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Helios Photo Voltaic Ltd vs Oriental Bank Of Commerce And Ors on 10 September, 2018

Bench: Ajay Kumar Mittal, Avneesh Jhingan

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

                                                               CWP No. 22826 of 2018
                                                               Decided on : 10.09.2018

Helios Photo Voltaic Ltd.
                                                                           . . . Petitioner(s)
                                           Versus
Oriental Bank of Commerce and others
                                                                      . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

PRESENT: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Chopra, Sr. Advocate with
         Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate,
         Mr. Varsha Banerjee, Advocate,
         Mr. Mayur Kanwar, Advocate,
         Mr. Ashutosh Jerath, Advocate and
         Mr. Eesha Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
                                 ****

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking direction to respondent No.4 to announce the policy for Resolution of Stressed Assets in terms of Circular DBR.No.BP.BC.101/21.04.048/2017-18, dated February 12, 2018 (Annexure P-1), issued by the Reserve Bank of India as well as direction to respondent No.2 to continue with the power purchase agreement dated 15.10.2010 (Annexure P-2).

2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to take all the pleas as raised in the present writ petition before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi.

3. Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to it, in accordance with law.



                                                     (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)
                                                            JUDGE

                                                      (AVNEESH JHINGAN)
September 10, 2018                                          JUDGE
J.Ram

Whether speaking/reasoned:     Yes/No
Whether Reportable:            Yes/No



                                         1 of 1
                     ::: Downloaded on - 02-10-2018 04:56:23 :::