Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Palaniammal vs The Commissioner Of Police on 28 August, 2015

Author: S.Tamilvanan

Bench: S.Tamilvanan, C.T.Selvam

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
						
DATED 28.08.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM

H.C.P. No.2026 of 2015


Palaniammal							... Petitioner
	
-v-

1.The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City, Chennai-600 007.

2.The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram District, Villupuram.

3.The Inspector of Police,
Elavarasankottai Police Station,
Villupuram District.

4.The Inspector of Police,
Kundrathur Police Station,
Kancheepuram District.					... Respondents

Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce the detenu Ayyasamy, aged about 18 years, son of Pitchaikaran, now in illegal custody of respondents, before this Court and set him at liberty. 

		For Petitioner	:	Mr.R.Sankarasubbu
	
		For Respondents	:	Mr.A.N.Thambi Durai, APP

O R D E R

(Order of the Court made by S.TAMILVANAN,J.) This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to cause production of the detenu Ayyasamy, aged about 18 years, son of Pitchaikaran, before this Court and to set him at liberty.

2.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the detenu has been arrested in connection with a criminal case registered under Sections 341, 294(b), 336, 292 and 427 IPC on the file of S-8 Adambakkam Police Station and he was remanded to judicial custody in furtherance of the remand order dated 20.08.2015, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Alandur.

3.As there is no illegal detention and the alleged detenu has been remanded to judicial custody, pursuant to a criminal case, we are of the view that the petition is liable to be dismissed.

4.It is made clear that it is open to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, according to law.

5.With the above observation, this petition is dismissed.

							    (STJ)      (CTSJ)
vga							       28.08.2015


To     

1.The Commissioner of Police,
Chennai City, Chennai-600 007.

2.The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram District, Villupuram.

3.The Inspector of Police,
Elavarasankottai Police Station,
Villupuram District.

4.The Inspector of Police,
Kundrathur Police Station,
Kancheepuram District.		

5.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Madras, 
Chennai 600 104.
S.TAMILVANAN J.
and
C.T.SELVAM J.

vga

















H.C.P. No.2026 of 2015

















28.08.2015