Karnataka High Court
Commissioner Of Service vs M/S Manipal County on 9 September, 2011
Bench: N.Kumar, Ravi Malimath
Tee eemawane A EASE ork ES ESE RINSE EAP MET eT I IMR PG WOME GP KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 4 he + Tex missioneratn, No. 16, SP.Ce jew, Lalt magn Road, . Regponmdent U/G.2254 of the Centre! F: ing owt of Final Order No.924/09 dated 23) 03/2009 | No. 81/3 12/2008 i SEE a REAR OTS sen << <= ze =
= se de a ¢
-
2wt
-
= "
"t x.
caf Zz z oe ag Z EN dy § # é 2 steten, after the payment of cervice tax wise and the _eathoriti notice under eub-See/ 1) in 2 be & "
Z 2 2 7 2 ee c ca PA Zz z F a = 3 £ a af < € .
*%, Pa Pi Fad
-
3 2 2 2a Z = 4 2 z $
2. Facts are net in dsspute. The assesses iax and imierest fbr delayed paymerite creiee motice w the Act. Bub ey , then the authorises eheal net serve any EmOLnt eo pea. Therefore, authorities have no authority to ritiete EL NS SIR) SUR ere SPORES