Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

The Commissioner Municipal ... vs Kachara Vahatuk Shramik Sangh on 1 December, 2021

Author: G.S.Kulkarni

Bench: G.S.Kulkarni

         Digitally signed
         by VIDYA
VIDYA    SURESH AMIN
SURESH   Date:
         2021.12.02
AMIN     11:16:01
         +0530




                                                                                       11.WP5357_2021.doc

                            Vidya Amin
                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 5357 OF 2021

                                     The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation
                                     of Greater Mumbai                               ... Petitioner
                                           V/s.
                                     Kachara Vahatuk Shramik Sangh                   ... Respondent

                                     Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Joel Carlos, Mr. Santosh
                                     Parad and Mr. Om Suryawanshi for the petitioner.
                                     Mr. Sanjay Singhavi, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Rohini Thyagarajan
                                     for the respondent.

                                                              CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 1 December, 2021 P.C.:

1. Stand over to 15 December, 2021 to enable Mr. Sakhare, learned senior counsel for the petitioner-Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to take instructions whether the respondents (580 workers) as involved in the present proceedings would stand governed by the order passed by the Supreme Court in the proceedings of Civil Appeal No. 4929 of 2017 dated 7 April, 2017, as prima facie it appears that 2700 employees involved in this case were identically situated as 580 workers in the present case.
2. Let the instructions be obtained and placed on record before this Court on the adjourned date of hearing.

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) 1/1