Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Ravindra Nath Rai And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 21 August, 2023

Author: Vipin Chandra Dixit

Bench: Vipin Chandra Dixit





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:168176
 
Court No. - 79
 
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3414 of 2018
 
Petitioner :- Ravindra Nath Rai And Another
 
Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Shekhar Rai
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Jitendra Shanker Pandey,Pankaj Roy
 
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
 

Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.2, is taken on record.

Heard Sri Chandra Shekhar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and Sri Pankaj Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2 and perused the record.

This petition under Article 227 has been filed on behalf of petitioner for setting aside the impugned order dated 07.03.2013 passed by IInd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ballia in Criminal Complaint Case No. 3159 of 2012 (Ashok Kumar Rai Vs.Ravindra Rai and another) and 24.01.2018 in Criminal Revision No. 186 of 2013 (Ravindra Nath Rai and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Another).

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the parties had amicably settled their dispute out side the Court and a written compromise has taken place between the parties. This Court vide order dated 10.07.2023 had directed the parties to appear before the court below for the verification of compromise.

In compliance of order dated 10.07.2022 both the parties were appeared before the court below on 22.07.2023 who were duly identified by their respective counsels and the compromise was verified by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 22.07.2023. Certified copy of order dated 22.07.2023 has been filed as Annexure S.A.-2 to the supplementary affidavit filed today.

Learned AGA for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 do not dispute the aforesaid facts.

In view of the aforesaid fact, since the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and compromise between the parties had already been verified by the Court below, the present petition under Article 227 is liable to be allowed.

Accordingly, the present petition under Article 227 is allowed and proceedings of Complaint Case No.3159 of 2012 (Ashok Kumar Rai Vs. Ravindra Rai and Another) under Sections 417, 418, 469 and 471 IPC is hereby quashed.

Order Date :- 21.8.2023 Virendra