Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rajesh Bhatia vs State Of Punjab And Others on 15 September, 2022

Author: Mahabir Singh Sindhu

Bench: Mahabir Singh Sindhu

                                                                       -1-
CWP-12953-2021 (O&M)




      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                   AT CHANDIGARH

                                              CWP-12953-2021 (O&M)

                                            Date of decision : 15.09.2022

Rajesh Bhatia
                                                     ...Petitioner

                                 Versus

State of Punjab and others
                                                          ...Respondent(s)


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU


Present:    Mr. Sukhandeep Singh, Advocate,
            for the petitioner.

            Ms. Anu Chatrath, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

            Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate,
            for respondent No.4.

                         -.-


MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J.

Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution inter-alia for quashing of the impugned order dated 11.06.2021 (P-5), whereby, State Government, shortlisted the names of 08 (eight) candidates including private respondent No.4-Lalit Pathak for medical examination as well as order dated 23.06.2021 (P-6) to the extent of appointment of aforesaid respondent to the post of President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kapurthala (for short, 'President, District Commission').

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 30-12-2022 22:27:50 ::: -2- CWP-12953-2021 (O&M)

2. Undisputedly, as per the recommendation dated 05.04.2021 made by the Selection Committee which was duly forwarded by the Registrar General of this Court vide letter dated 06.04.2021, petitioner is higher in merit than the private respondent No.4 and for reference, the same is recapitulated as under:-

District Name of Merit Appointee Merit Petitioner Position (Respondent No.) Position Kapurthala Rajesh Bhatia 1 Lalit Pathak 3 (R. No.4)
3. Concededly, aforesaid impugned orders including the appointment of private respondent No.4 has been quashed and set aside by this Court while allowing CWP-11409-2021 titled as Kamal Kant and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, vide order of even date.
4. In view of the above, present petition is also allowed in the same terms.

Ordered accordingly.





15.09.2022                                          (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU)
atulsethi                                                   JUDGE


           Whether speaking / reasoned :                       Yes         No
           Whether Reportable :                                Yes         No




                                     2 of 2
                 ::: Downloaded on - 30-12-2022 22:27:50 :::