Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Endosulfan Manufacturers And vs State Of Karnataka on 20 February, 2015

Bench: Chief Justice, Ram Mohan Reddy

                        1

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

    DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015

                    PRESENT

   THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE

                       AND

   THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

    WRIT PETITION NOS.7755 -7758/2011 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN

1. M/S. ENDOSULFAN MANUFACTURERS AND
   FORMULATORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
   (E.M.F.W.A.), HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
   NO.722, TULSIANI CHAMBERS, EAST WING
   7TH FLOOR, FREE PRESS JOURNAL MARG
   NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400021
   REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
   MR. C.C.ABRAHAM, AGED 69 YEARS
   R/O NO.79, KUMARANASAN NAGAR
   KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM
   KOCHI-682020

2. EXCEL CROP CARE LTD.,
   A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
   COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS
   CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.13
   ARADHANA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
   CORPORATION, NEAR VIRVANI INDUSTRIAL
   ESTATE, GOREGAON(EAST), MUMBAI-400063
   REP BY ITS DY.G.M. DINESH DAVE

3. M/S. HYDERABAD CHEMICALS LIMITED
   A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
   COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS
   REGISTERED OFFICE AT 4-3-475
   DEVIKA MAHAL, BANK STREET
   HYDERABAD-500095
   REP BY ITS SENIOR EXECUTIVE
   A G SATHEESH
                           2

4. M/S. BHARATH INSECTICIDES LTD.,
   A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
   COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS
   CORPORATE OFFICE AT 1506
   VIKRAM TOWER, RAJENDRA PLACE
   NEW DELHI-110008, REP BY ITS
   AREA BUSINESS MANAGER
   L CHANNAMALLA REDDY
                                       ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI VIKRAM V.R. ADV., FOR SRI S. SRIRANGA, ADV.,)

AND

1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
      REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
      VIDHANA SOUDHA
      BANGALORE-560001

2.    KUMARI SHOBA KARANDLAJE
      MINISTER FOR ENERGY, FOOD & CIVIL
      SUPPLIES, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
      VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001

3.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
      DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT
      MANGALORE

4.    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
      PUTTUR SUB-DIVISION
      PUTTUR, D.K. DISTRICT

5.    THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
      HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT
      VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001

6.    THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY
      KANNADA & CULTURE, INFORMATION
      AND TOURISM DEPARTMENT
      VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001

7.    THE PRESIDING OFFICER
      SOCIAL SECURITY & PENSIONS
      DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
      M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001
                          3


8.    THE TAHASILDAR
      BELTHANGADI TALUK
      DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT

9.    THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF
      AGRICULTURE
      GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
      VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-1

10.   THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR
      DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
      OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE
      SESHADRI ROAD, BANGALORE-1

11.   UNION OF INDIA
      REP BY MINISTRY OF HEALTH &
      FAMILY WELFARE, NEW DELHI

12.   UNION OF INDIA
      REP BY MINISTRY OF FOREST AND
      ENVIRONMENT, NEW DELHI
      (R-11 & 12 ARE IMPLEADED V/O
       DATED 22.11.2012)
                                      ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI R. DEVDAS, PRL.GA FOR R-1 & 3 TO 10;
 SRI G. LAKSHMEESH RAO & SRI S K ACHARYA, ADVS.,
 FOR R-2,
 SRI ARVIND SHARMA, ADV., FOR MR. KRISHNA S. DIXIT,
 ASG FOR R-11 & 12)

     THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER
ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
PRAYING TO QUASH THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED
27.03.2010 ISSUED BY 6TH RESPONDENT VIDE
ANNEXURE-J AND ALSO THAT OF THE GOVERNMENT
ORDER DATED 19.02.2010 ISSUED BY THE 7TH
RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND ETC.,

    THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, RAM MOHAN
REDDY .J MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                 4

                              ORDER

Taking on record the memo dated 20.02.2015 for withdrawal of the writ petitions, on the following premise, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn:

"In the meanwhile, proceedings have been initiated before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in WP (Civil) No.213/2011 raising various issues inter alia including the subject matter of the present writ petition. In view of these developments, the Petitioners herein are desirous of withdrawing the writ petition for the present, reserving liberty to file fresh proceedings before the appropriate forum on the same cause of action."

It is needless to state that if the petitioners are advised to approach the appropriate forum to have their grievance redressed, may do so if law permits.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE bkv