Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mrs. Veena Sahani vs Army Welfare Education Society (Awes) on 10 December, 2024

Author: H.P.Sandesh

Bench: H.P.Sandesh

                                               -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC:50898
                                                       MFA No. 1602 of 2022




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

                                             BEFORE

                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1602 OF 2022 (CPC)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    MRS. VEENA SAHANI,
                         W/O (RETD) COL. M.P.SAHANI,
                         AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
                         (DOB:- JUNE/02ND/1966),
                         PRINCIPAL,
                         ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL
                         KAMARAJ ROAD,
                         BENGALURU- 560001.
                                                                  ...APPELLANT

                           (BY SRI. SHIJU ABRAHAM VERGHIS, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    ARMY WELFARE EDUCATION SOCIETY (AWES),
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M              REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
Location: HIGH           NO.202, SHANKAR VIHAR,
COURT OF                 DELHI CANTT. NEW DELHI,
KARNATAKA                 PIN CODE-110 010.

                   2.    GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF
                         HEADQUARTERS, SOUTHERN COMMAND
                         KHADAKWASLA, PUNE, MAHARASTRA,
                         PIN CODE-411 023.

                   3.    GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING AND PATRON,
                         ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL,
                         HEADQUARTERS,
                         KARNATAKA AND KERALA SUB AREA
                         CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU,
                         PIN CODE -560 001.
                           -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC:50898
                                   MFA No. 1602 of 2022




4.   DEPUTY GENERAL OFFICER
     COMMANDING AND CHAIRMAN,
     ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL,
     HEADQUARTERS,
     KARNATAKA AND KERALA SUB AREA,
     CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU,
     PIN CODE -560 001.

5.   COLONEL (OFFICER IN CHARGE-SCHOOL),
     HEADQUARTERS,
     KARNATAKA AND KERALA SUB AREA,
     CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU,
     PIN CODE -560 001.

6.   COLONEL (TRAINING),
     HEADQUARTERS,
     KARNATAKA AND KERALA SUB AREA,
     CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU,
     PIN CODE -560 001.

7.   COL. G.P.SINGH,
     COLONEL (TRAINING),
     HEADQUARTERS,
     KARNATAKA AND KERALA SUB AREA,
     CUBBON ROAD, BENGALURU,
     PIN CODE-560 001.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

     (BY SRI. CHANDRACHUD A., ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R7;
      SRI. C.SHASHIKANTHA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 TO R6)

     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.02.2021 PASSED ON I.A.NOS.1
AND 2 IN O.S.NO.25984/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE LVII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYOHALL
UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH NO.58), DISMISSING I.A. NO.1 FILED
UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF
CPC AND ALLOWING I.A.NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 4
OF CPC.

    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                -3-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC:50898
                                         MFA No. 1602 of 2022




CORAM:     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

                         ORAL JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the matter has become infructuous, since the main plaint was rejected by the Trial Court and hence this appellant is not pressing the above appeal and may be permitted to withdraw the appeal.

2. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26