Karnataka High Court
Mr J Rajan vs Mr R Tulasidas on 23 February, 2017
Author: B.Veerappa
Bench: B. Veerappa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA
R.F.A. NO.864/2013 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. MR. J. RAJAN
S/O MR. V. JANARDHAN
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1042
11TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE
BANGALORE - 560 040
2. MRS. BINDU RAJAN
W/O J. RAJAN
AGED 40 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1042
11TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 040
3. MASTER HEBIN RAJ
S/O MR. J. RAJAN
AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1042
11TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 040
4. MASTER HRITIK RAJAN
S/O MR. J. RAJAN
AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1042
11TH MAIN, RPC LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 040
SINCE DEFENDANT Nos.8 & 9/
APPELLANT NOs.3 & 4, THEY
ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR
2
MOTHER DEFENDANT No.7/
APPELLANT No.2.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRIYUTS K.V. SHYAMAPRASAD, ADV., FOR A1
ANIL KUMAR, ADV., FOR A2 TO A4)
AND:
1. MR. R. TULASIDAS
S/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.246
2ND MAIN, SUBHASHNAGAR
MYSORE - 570 023
2. MR. R. GOPALAKRISHNA
S/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
RESIDING AT KHB COLONY
NAGAMANGALA - 571 401
MANDYA DISTRICT
3. MR. R. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O MR.Y.H. RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.38/2
6TH CROSS, GUMMAIAH LAYOUT
PADMANABHANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 070
4. MRS. JAYAMMA
W/O LATE LAKKANNA
D/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
RESIDING AT RAMASAGARA VILLAGE
MAYASANDRA HOBLI
TURUVEKERE TALUK - 572 102
TUMKUR DISTRICT
5. MRS. VANAJAMMA
W/O MR. VAJRAIAH @
CHIKKAIAH
D/O MR. Y.H. RAMAIAH
3
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1042
11TH MAIN
VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE
BANGALORE - 560 040
6. MR. C.UMESH BABU @
UMESH TEJASVI
S/O MR. CHIKKAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.1042
11TH MAIN
VIJAYANAGAR II STAGE
BANGALORE - 560 040
...RESPONDENTS
THIS R.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W
ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 24.01.2013 PASSED IN OS
NO.2302/2002 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII ADDL. CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY
DECREEING AND PARTLY DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
PARTITION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS R.FA. IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for both the parties submits that the dispute between the parties in respect of the suit schedule property has been settled on a compromise petition filed in R.F.A. No.1156/2009 before this Court on 10.11.2016. 4
In view of the same, the present appeal is disposed of in the same terms and conditions as referred in R.F.A. No.1156/2009.
In view of the disposal of main appeal, I.A.1/2016 for impleading and taking steps to respondents does not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE BS