Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Tema India Ltd vs Seok-Am Tech Co.Ltd (Also Known As ... on 12 June, 2023

Author: R.I. Chagla

Bench: R.I. Chagla

                                                                              37.CARBP.342.20 wt..doc



                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                COMM. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 342 OF 2020
                                  WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1208 OF 2020

Tema India Ltd.                                      ...         Petitioner/Applicant

           Versus

Seok-Am Tech Co. Ltd.                                ...       Respondent



Mr. Darius Khambata, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Y.P. Dandiwala, Ms. K.R.
Davierwala, Mr. Yazdi P. Jijina i/b Mulla & Mulla & CBC for the Petitioner.
Mr. Firoz Bharucha a/w Mr. Ziyad Madon, Mr. M.A. Kamdar and Mr.
Karshil Shah i/b Kanga & Company for the Respondent.

                                         CORAM :         R.I. CHAGLA, J.
                                         DATED :         12th JUNE, 2023.
ORDER :

1 By the order dated 06.01.2023 this Court had considered the submission of Mr. Khambata, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner/Applicant that there was one specific ground of challenge raised in the present Petition, pertaining to the aspect of limitation. The finding of the arbitral tribunal was rendered in the impugned award which was submitted to be unsustainable on a proper interpretation of the relevant provisions of law. This has been recorded in paragraph 2 of the said order.

Waghmare 1/2 ::: Uploaded on - 13/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 14/06/2023 10:48:07 :::

37.CARBP.342.20 wt..doc 2 Mr. Bharucha for the Respondent had submitted that there was no merit in the contention raised on behalf of the Petitioner. Accordingly, considering the rival contention raised on behalf of parties, this Court noted that since it appears that the only issue of limitation is being seriously contested in the present Petition, it can be heard finally at the stage of admission.

3 The parties were to place on record brief notes of argument and compilation of judgments in support of their respective contentions. 4 This Court had also granted stay of the impugned award subject to the Applicant/Petitioner depositing an amount of Rs.5 crores with the Prothonotary and Senior Master within six weeks from the date of the said order. The Petitioner has complied with this direction and the impugned award is stayed.

5 The Counsel for the parties have requested for extension of time to place on record the brief notes of argument and compilation of documents. Accordingly, the parties shall do so on or before 26.06.2023. 6 The Arbitration Petition shall be listed for hearing on 28.06.2023, at the bottom of the admission board.

(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) Waghmare 2/2 ::: Uploaded on - 13/06/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 14/06/2023 10:48:07 :::