Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Thomas Mathew vs Regional Passport Officer on 9 March, 2003

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

       MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2017/1ST KARTHIKA, 1939

                    WP(C).No. 33547 of 2017 (P)
                    ----------------------------


PETITIONER:
----------

            THOMAS MATHEW,
            AGED 68 YEARS, S/O MATHEW MATHEW,
            PANTHIRUVELIL HOUSE, PONKUNNAM PO,
            KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

            BY ADV. SRI.LAL GEORGE

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER,
            REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE,
            PANAMPALLY NAGAR PO, KOCHI.682036.

          2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
            VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU,
            KOTTAYAM UNIT, KOTTAYAM, PIN.

          3. UNION OF INDIA,
            REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
            MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI.PIN.110001.

          R1,R3  BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
                          SMT C.G.PREETHA,CGC
            R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT VINEETHA HARIRAJ

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
       ON  23-10-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:

K.V.

WP(C).No. 33547 of 2017 (P)
----------------------------

                                APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

EXHIBIT P1     TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE BYLAW OF THE
              BANK WHICH PERMITS CHEQUE DISCOUNTING FACILITY.

EXHIBIT P2     TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.H.C 214/09 DATED 09.03.2003
              OBTAINED FROM THE SECRETARY, KANJIRAPPALLY GRAMA
              PANCHAYAT OFFICE EVIDENCING THESE FACTS.

EXHIBIT P3     TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 13.7.2011 OBTAINED FROM
              THE SUB TREASURY OFFICE, PONKUNNAM UNDER THE RIGHT TO
              INFORMATION ACT, REGARDING THE LOSS OF CHEQUE LEAVES
              FROM THE VPF ACCOUNT NO 423193 OF KANJIRAPPALY GRAMA
              PANCHAYAT.

EXHIBIT P4     TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20.5.2009 ISSUED FROM
              THE PONKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED IN
              THAT REGARD.

EXHIBIT P5     TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 14.7.2011 ISSUED
              FROM THE PONKUNNAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
              EVIDENCING THE FINANCIAL POSITION OF THE BANK DURING
              THE PERIOD 2003-04.

EXHIBIT P6     TRUE COPY OF THE FACTUAL REPORT DATED 31.5.08.

EXHIBIT P7     TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED NIL ISSUED FROM THE
              LISSY HOSPITAL ERNAKULAM IN THAT REGARD.

EXHIBIT P7(A)  TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED NIL ISSUED FROM THE
              LISSY HOSPITAL ERNAKULAM IN THAT REGARD.

EXHIBIT P8     TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26.4.2017 CALLING FOR
              THE  EXPLANATION FROM THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P9     TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED 02.6.2017.

EXHIBIT P10    TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19.6.2017.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS    NIL
-----------------------



                                                  /TRUE COPY/


K.V.                                              P.S.TO JUDGE



              K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
              ------------------------------------------
            W.P.(C) No. 33547 of 2017 (P)
              ------------------------------------------
               Dated: 23rd October, 2017


                     J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the rejection of a passport application at Ext.P10. The passport application was rejected for reason of non disclosure of a crime pending against the petitioner.

2. The petitioner submits that about 14 years back, when he was employed as a Secretary of Ponkunnuam Service Co-operative Bank, one of the customers had discounted two cheques, which later turned out to be cheques which were stolen from the Panchayat. The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau had initiated a proceeding against him and despite a factual report having been submitted, as is seen from Ext.P6, there is no charge submitted before Court. The W.P.(C) No. 33547/2017 -2- crime has been registered before the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge (Vigilance), Kottayam.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that only since the application was made through another, he did not disclose the said crime status. In fact, the petitioner's remedy would be to approach the Court, in which the crime is pending and seek for a short validity passport. The petitioner will be free to make a fresh application after getting permission from the Vigilance Court.

Leaving open such remedy, the writ petition is closed. No Costs.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 23/10/17