Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 16]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Anjana Banerjee (Naskar) vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 3 March, 2017

Author: Subrata Talukdar

Bench: Subrata Talukdar

                                     1



03.03.2017
S.L-95(KB)

                                 W. P. 5523 (W) of 2015


                                Anjana Banerjee (Naskar)
                                       Versus
                               The State of West Bengal & Ors.


                         Mr. Asit Kumar Banerjee
                         Mr. Sib Narayan Chattopadhyay
                                    ... For the Petitioner.

                        Mr. Amitesh Banerjee
                        Mr. Tarak Karan
                                   ... For the State-respondents.

Mrs. Rituparna De Ghose Miss Rimpa Rajpal ... For the Respondent Nos.3 & 5. Mr. Alok Kumar Pal ... For the Respondent No.6.

Mr. Sib Narayan Chattopadhyay, Learned Advocate appears for the writ petitioner.

On behalf of the Respondent Nos. 3 and 5, Mrs. Rituparna De Ghose, Learned Counsel appears.

On behalf of the Respondent No.6, Mr. Alok Kumar Pal, Learned Advocate appears.

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 file their affidavits-in-opposition in Court today, which are taken on record.

2

Counsel for the Petitioner prays for an accommodation to file affidavit-in-reply.

Such accommodation is granted. It is expected that the affidavit-in-reply shall be filed by two weeks with an advance copy served on Learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3, 5 and 6.

Liberty to mention the matter for inclusion in the list under the same heading "Hearing 2015 to 2017" after the period granted to file affidavit-in-reply stands completed.

(Subrata Talukdar,J.)