Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Puthiya Ponmanichintakath Kunhammad ... vs Chief Executive Officer on 20 May, 2022

Author: S.V.Bhatti

Bench: S.V.Bhatti

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
                                      &
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
          FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 30TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                          CRP(WAKF) NO. 30 OF 2019
    AGAINST THE ORDER IN OA 47/2019 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE
PETITIONER/S:

              PUTHIYA PONMANICHINTAKATH KUNHAMMAD KOYA
              AGED 80 YEARS
              S/O. P. I. AALIKOYA HAJI, HOUSE NO.11/81, ARAVIND GHOSH ROAD,
              KOZHIKODE.

              BY ADVS.
              K.M.FIROZ
              SMT.M.SHAJNA
              SRI.E.C.AHAMED FAZIL
              SRI.P.C.MUHAMMED NOUSHIQ



RESPONDENT/S:

     1        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              KERALA STATE WAQF BOARD, VIP ROAD, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682
              017.

     2        PATHUMMABI JAMEEL
              MATAVALLI , WAKF ALAL AUOLAD, MULLANTAKATH AISHABI
              HAJJUMMA WAQF, SNEHAVEEDHI, THIRUVANGOOR, KOZHIKODE -
              673 029.

              BY ADVS.
              SRI.T.P.SAJID, SC, KERALA STATE WAQF BOARD
              SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN
              SRI.P.A.HARISH
              SHRI.T.K.SAIDALIKUTTY, SC, WAQF BOARD


         THIS CRP (WAKF ACT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.05.2022, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRP(WAKF) NO. 30 OF 2019
                                 -2-

                            ORDER

S.V.Bhatti, J.

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner states that Mr. Puthiya Ponmanichintakath Kunhahammad Koya/revision petitioner is no more.

2. The C.R.P.(Wakf) is at the instance of the petitioner. The petitioner is deceased, and the legal heirs are not coming on record. Hence, we are of the view that the instant C.R.P.(Wakf) be closed as abated. However, liberty is granted to the legal heirs of the petitioner, if circumstances warrant, to take steps as required by law.

C.R.P.(Wakf) is closed as abated for the above reason.

Sd/-

S.V.BHATTI JUDGE Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI JUDGE JS