Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Mr Srinivasan vs Chief Controller Of Expolsives on 9 September, 2019

Author: Alok Aradhe

Bench: Alok Aradhe

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019

                         BEFORE

         THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

       W.P.Nos.21876 - 21880/2019 (GM - RES)

BETWEEN :

1.     Mr. SRINIVASAN
       S/O LATE N.K.SUNDARESH IYER,
       AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, NO.20,
       515 COLONY, HAL 3RD STAGE,
       NEW TIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560075

2.     Mr. KRISHNA REDDY
       S/O LATE P.N.APPANNA REDDY,
       AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, G-01,
       CENTRE COURT APARTMENT,
       515 COLONY, HAL 3RD STAGE,
       NEW TIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560075

3.     Mr. RAVI KRISHNAN
       S/O Mr. RAMALINGAM,
       AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
       NO.302, CENTRE COURT APARTMENT,
       515 COLONY, HAL 3RD STAGE,
       NEW TIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560075

4.     Mr. B.VIJENDRA REDDY
       S/O VIJAYA NARAYANA REDDY,
       AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NO. 15,
       CENTRE COURT APARTMENT,
       515 COLONY, HAL 3RD STAGE,
       NEW TIPPASANDRA, BANGALORE-560075

5.     Mr. ANUP KUMAR
       S/O Mr. KRISHNA,
       AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, NO. 816,
                              2



        HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR,
        BANGALORE-560038                       ...PETITIONERS

                 (BY SRI BALARAM M.L., ADV.)

AND :

1.      CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPOLSIVES
        A BLOCK, CGO COMPLEX,
        5TH FLOOR, SEMINARY HILLS,
        NAGPUR (MAHARASHTRA)-440006

2.      JOINT CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES
        A AND D WING, BLOCK 1-8,
        2ND FLOOR, HADDOUS ROAD,
        NUNGAMBAKKAM,
        CHENNAI (TN)-600006

3.      COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
        BANGALORE CITY,
        NO.1, INFANTRY ROAD,
        BANGALORE-560001

4.      ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
        TOWN PLANNING (EAST)
        BRUHAT BANGALORE
        MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
        DIRECTORATE OF TOWN AND
        COUNTRY PLANNING,
        GPO PB # 5257,
        MULTI STOREYED BUILDING
        PHASE IV, Dr. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
        BANGALORE-560001

5.      UNION OF INDIA
        MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM
        AND NATURAL GAS, A-WING,
        SHASTRI BHAWAN,
        RAJENDR PRASAD ROAD,
        NEW DELHI-110001.
        REP BY ITS SECRETARY
                              3



6.    SHELL INDIA MARKETS PRIVATE LIMITED
      A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
      THE INDIAN COMPANIS ACT,
      A SUBSIDIARY OF ROYAL
      DUTCH SHELL PLC:
      HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
      AT GURGAON AND THE BRANCH OFFICE
      IN CONCERN TO THE CAUSE
      IS AT PLOT NO.7,
      BANGALORE HARDWARE PARK,
      KIADB INDUSTRIAL PARK,
      MAHADEVA KODIGEHALLI,
      NEAR DEVANAHALLI,
      BANGALORE-562149, REP. BY ITS
      AUTHORIZED REPRESENTITIVE         ...RESPONDENTS

     (BY SMT.ANUPAMA HEGDE, ADV. FOR R-1, R-2 & R-5;
          SRI VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R-3;
           SRI K.N.PUTTEGOWDA, ADV. FOR R-4;
           SMT.NIMISHA KUMAR, ADV. FOR R-6.)

     THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE R-3 TO NOTIFY THE
CANCELLATION OF 'NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE' TO THE R-1
UNDER THE MANDATES OF RULE 144[4] AND RULE 150 OF THE
PETROLEUM RULES, 2002, NOTIFYING CANCELLATION/NON-
RENEWAL OF THE NO-OBJECTION, BASED ON CONCLUSIONS
ARRIVED AT BY THE R-3 PROCEEDINGS DATED 30.01.2019 AT
ANNEXURE-M.

     THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:

                        ORDER

Sri.Balaram M.V., learned counsel for the petitioners. 4

2. Sri.Vijaykumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that since 'No Objection Certificate' issued in favour of respondent No.6 to set up the petrol bunk has been cancelled by order dated 25.05.2019, nothing survives for adjudication in these writ petitions.

3. The aforesaid submission is placed on record. Needless to state that the respondent No.6 is granted liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.

Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE Dvr: