Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Shib Krishna Debutter Estate vs Janab Jalaluddin Ahmed Siddique & Ors on 8 July, 2010

Author: Sanjib Banerjee

Bench: Sanjib Banerjee

                                  1


                         GA No. 2156 of 2010
                         CS No. 224 of 2009

                IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

                 Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction

                           ORIGINAL SIDE




               SHIB KRISHNA DEBUTTER ESTATE
                           Versus
          JANAB JALALUDDIN AHMED SIDDIQUE & ORS.


BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE

Date : 8th July, 2010.

Appearance:

Mr. Arnab Dutt, Adv.
Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Adv.
Mr. Syed N. Arefin, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Karmakar, Adv.
Mr. Sandip De, Adv.
Mrs. Era Ghosh, Adv.
The Court : This is an application by the defendant nos.8 and 9 to file their written statements in a suit seeking a declaration that the 2 defendant nos.1 to 7 are liable to pay the Municipal taxes in respect of a certain property. The applying defendants say that the writ of summons was served on them late in November, 2009.
Considering the explanation proffered in the application the time to file the written statements by the applying defendants is extended by a fortnight from date.
It is, however, surprising that the Corporation agrees to contest the suit and wants to get involved in the disputes between the private parties herein. The suit is one where the plaintiff seeks a declaration that the defendant nos.1 to 7 should pay the Municipal rates and taxes in respect of a Weston Street property. It is not really the Municipal Corporation's concern as to who is liable to pay as long as Municipal Corporation can take steps, as entitled under the relevant statute, to proceed to recover its dues. It cannot immediately be appreciated as to why the Corporation and its assessor-collector, who have been impleaded, seek to contest the suit on merits.
The department will forward a copy of this order to the Municipal Commissioner.
GA No.2156 of 2010 is disposed of without any order as to costs.
3
Urgent certified photocopies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(SANJIB BANERJEE, J.) kc.
A.R(C.R)