Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Cfa Institute vs Deputy Registrar Of Trademarks on 25 January, 2023

Author: Sanjeev Narula

Bench: Sanjeev Narula

                          $~3
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +     C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 123/2021
                                CFA INSTITUTE                                                   ..... Appellant
                                                     Through:       Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate.

                                                     versus

                                DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS                               ..... Respondent
                                                     Through:       Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar,
                                                                    CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra,
                                                                    Mr. Sagar Mehlawat and Mr.
                                                                    Alexander    Mathai     Paikaday,
                                                                    Advocates.

                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
                                                     ORDER

% 25.01.2023

1. The present appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is directed against Statement of Grounds dated 05th October, 2018 and order dated 29th August, 2018, refusing Appellant's application No. 2680698 for registration of the mark "CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST" in class 9 [hereinafter, "subject mark"].

2. Grounds for refusal are as under:

"With reference to the above and request on Form TM-M dated 14/09/2018. It has been decided by the Registrar of Trade Marks to inform you that hearing in respect of above application was held on 13/08/2018 and the said application is refused on the following Grounds;
* The applicant advocate Ms. Nidhi Rastogi appeared. I have heard the argument and also perused the documents available on record.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SAPNA SETHI Signing Date:25.01.2023 18:41:17
Objection under section 9 is sustained, application is refused for registration.
* 9 - Absolute grounds for refusal of registration. * 9(1)(a) - The trade mark is devoid of any distinctive character, that is to say, not capable of Distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of another person:
* 9(1)(b) - The Trade Mark consist exclusively of marks or indications which serve in trade to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, values, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or rendering of the service or other characteristics of the goods or services.
Since the objection raised in the Examination Report under section 9 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as mentioned above cannot be waived and Ld. Counsel failed to convince at the time of hearing in proving his/her case, the above mentioned application is refused."

3. The Senior Examiner has objected to the registration stating that subject mark is devoid of distinctiveness and is descriptive of services to which it is applied. It has emerged that Appellant holds registration of an identical mark in the same class under Application No. 791237. Counsel for Appellant draws the Court's attention to judgement dated 04th August, 2006 in Association for Investment Management & Research and Anr. v. The Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India and Anr. wherein, this Court formed a prima facie opinion that the subject mark - "CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST" has acquired a secondary meaning and is therefore, distinctive.1

4. In view of the above, objections under Section 9 of the Trademarks Act are not sustainable and accordingly, the present appeal is allowed with following directions:

(i) Statement of Grounds dated 05th October, 2018 and order dated 29th August, 2018, are set aside.
1

2006 SCC OnLine Del 1673.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SAPNA SETHI Signing Date:25.01.2023 18:41:17

(ii) Trademark Registry is directed to process Appellant's application No. 2680698 for the mark "CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST" in class 9. Subject mark be advertised within a period of three months from today.

(iii) If there is any opposition, the same shall be decided on its own merits, uninfluenced by observations made hereinabove.

(iv) It is clarified that registration of subject mark shall not vest any exclusive rights in the expression "Financial Analyst". This disclaimer shall be reflected at the time of advertisement of subject mark and also if subject mark ultimately proceeds for registration.

5. With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of.

6. Registry is directed to supply a copy of the present order to the Trademark Registry at [email protected] for compliance.

SANJEEV NARULA, J JANUARY 25, 2023 as Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SAPNA SETHI Signing Date:25.01.2023 18:41:17