Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Bombay High Court

Mustafa Shaha Ismail Shaha vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 21 January, 2016

Author: Vasanti A. Naik

Bench: Vasanti A. Naik, A.S. Chandurkar

                  wp3489.15.odt                                                                                           1/2


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY




                                                                                                                      
                                             NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

                                                   WRIT PETITION NO.3489 OF 2015




                                                                                        
                   PETITIONER:                                Mustafa   Shaha   Ismail   Shaha,   Aged
                                                              about   42   years,   R/o   Painganga
                        
                                                              Nagar,   Moula   Road,   Mehkar,   Dist.
                                                              Buldhana.




                                                                                       
                                                                         
                                                           
                                                                    -VERSUS-




                                                                   
                   RESPONDENTS:                              1.         The State of Maharashtra,  Through
                                    ig                                  it's   Secretary,   Social   Welfare
                                                                        Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai -
                                                                        440032.
                                                             2.         The   Divisional   Caste   Scrutiny,
                                  
                                                                        Through           its         Member
                                                                        Secretary/President   Administrative
                                                                        Building,   2nd  Floor,   Collectorate
                                                                        Premises, Akola.
                                                             3.         The   Chief   Officer,   Nagar   Parishad,
      


                                                                        Mehkar, Dist. Buldhana.
                                                                                                                                       
   



                  Shri V. R. Choudhari, Advocate for the petitioner.
                  Shri N. S. Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and 2.
                  Shri A. R. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.3.





                          CORAM:    SMT. VASANTI  A. NAIK
                                                           AND 
                                                A.S. CHANDURKAR JJ.





                           DATED
                                  :   21
                                              JANUARY, 2016.
                                         st  




                  ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per Smt. Vasanti  A. Naik, J)

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

::: Uploaded on - 25/01/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 01:52:13 ::: wp3489.15.odt 2/2

By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent - Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within a time frame. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No.3 to protect his services till his caste claim is decided.

Shri Rao, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Scrutiny Committee states on instructions that the caste claim of the petitioner is pending before the Committee and the Committee would decide it as early as possible.

In view of the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, we allow the writ petition. The respondent -

Scrutiny Committee is directed to decide the caste claim of the petitioner as early as possible and positively within a period of one year from the date of appearance before the Scrutiny Committee. The petitioner undertakes to appear before the Scrutiny Committee on 8-2-2016. Since the petitioner was not at fault in not producing the caste validity certificate, the services of the petitioner are protected till his caste claim is decided.

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

                                      JUDGE                                                       JUDGE 


                  //MULEY//




    ::: Uploaded on - 25/01/2016                                            ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 01:52:13 :::