Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/89/2022 on 21 February, 2022
Author: Narayan Singh Dhanik
Bench: Narayan Singh Dhanik
Office Notes,
reports, orders
SL. or proceedings
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No or directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
WPSB No. 89 of 2022
Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, ACJ.
Shri Narayan Singh Dhanik, J.
Shri K. K. Harbola, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Pradeep Joshi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/ respondent no. 1.
Shri D.S. Patni, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Shri B. S. Bisht, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
Learned counsel for the parties submits that the controversy raised in the present petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 30.11.2015 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WPSB No. 494 of 2015 (Lalita Prasad Tewari Vs. Uttarakhand Payjal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam) and a batch of petitions, therefore, present petition may also be disposed of in terms of aforesaid judgement.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 30.11.2015 passed by Division Bench of this Court in WPSB No. 494 of 2015 (Lalita Prasad Tewari Vs. Uttarakhand Payjal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam).
(N.S. Dhanik, J.) (S.K. Mishra, ACJ.) 21.02.2022 SKS