Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

The Union Of India vs Kumari Anamika Ray on 18 November, 2019

Bench: Chief Justice, Dinesh Kumar Singh

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22462 of 2019


1    The Union of India through the Secretary cum D.G.,Department of Posts,
     Das Bhawan,New Delhi-110001.
2.   The Chief Postmaster General,Bihar Circle,Patna-800001
3.   The Post Master General, Northern Region, Muzaffarpur-842002
4.   The Superintendent of Post Officers, Siwan Division, Siwan-841226
5.   The Inspector of Post Offices, Central Sub-Division, Siwan-841226


                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus

     Kumari Anamika Ray, W/o Late Pankaj Kumar Ray, Resident of Village and
     P.O. Belaon, Via-Done, Dist.-Siwan

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Adv.
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
     ORAL JUDGMENT
     (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

      Date : 18-11-2019

                  The petitioners are aggrieved with the impugned order

      dated 02.01.2019, passed in O.A. No. 50/1081/2018 by the

      Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna, titled as

      Kumari Anamika Ray Vs. Postal.

                  We noticed that after the matter was adjourned on

      05.02.2019

, the matter is pending for consideration with the appropriate authority, i.e., the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna.

Patna High Court CWJC No.22462 of 2019 dt.18-11-2019 2/2 Having considered the material placed on record, we are of the considered view that the interest of justice would be best met, if the Tribunal is requested to decide the main matter within a period of four weeks. Moreso, in the light of the decision dated 12.09.2019 rendered by this Court in CWJC No.18459 of 2019, titled as the Union of India and Ors. Vs. Irshad Gani along with other analogous cases.

Needless to say that such decision has to be in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing to all affected persons.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to mention the matter before the appropriate authority within a period of one week.

The instant writ application stands disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NIL
Uploading Date          19.11.2019
Transmission Date       NIL