Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Noor Bhanu Bibi vs The Union Of India And 3 Ors on 5 November, 2019

Author: Manojit Bhuyan

Bench: Manojit Bhuyan, Ajit Borthakur

                                                                    Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010150092017




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C) 7319/2017

            1:NOOR BHANU BIBI
            W/O. ANJAN ALI MIAH, D/O. BASERUDDIN @ SHEIKH BASERUDDIN, VILL.
            CHAGALIA PART-II, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM.

            VERSUS

            1:THE UNION OF INDIA and 3 ORS.
            REP. BY ITS SECRETARY OF THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, UNION OF
            INDIA, NEW DELHI.

            2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
             REP. BY THE COMM. and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
             HOME DEPTT.
             DISPUR
             GUWAHATI-6.

            3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF DHUBRI DISTRICT
            AT DHUBRI
             P.O.
             P.S. and DIST. DHUBRI
            ASSAM.

            4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE B
             DHUBRI
             P.O.
             P.S. and DIST. DHUBRI
            ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR.S MOLLAH

Advocate for the Respondent :
                                                                              Page No.# 2/2

                                     BEFORE
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR

                                      O R D E R

05.11.2019 (Manojit Bhuyan, J) None for the petitioner appears on call. Ms. G. Hazarika, learned counsel represents respondent no.1 whereas Mr. J. Payeng, learned counsel represents respondent nos.2, 3 and 4.

List for Admission again after two weeks. Case records so received be retained.

Office to correctly reflect the name of Mr. A.T. Sarkar in the Cause List instead of "A.T. Saikia".

We make it clear that on the next date if there is no representation, this could would consider recall of the interim bail granted on 29.11.2017.

                         JUDGE                          JUDGE




Comparing Assistant