Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Madras High Court

S.B. Varadarajulu vs Emperor on 4 March, 1924

Equivalent citations: AIR1925MAD183, AIR 1925 MADRAS 183

ORDER
 

Venkatasubba Rao, J.
 

1. The word "punishment" in Section 3 of the Whipping Act, has been interpreted as the "total of punishments awardable" by the learned Judges who decided Queen-Empress v. Dagadu (1892) 16 Bom. 357. In lieu of punishing the offender by sentencing him to imprisonment and imposing on him a fine, the Court may punish him with whipping. The portion of the sentence, imposing the fine, must, therefore, be set aside. I accordingly do so and direct that the fine be refunded.