Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Sharad Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 January, 2018

Author: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

                                                                                                           NAFR


                           HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                                 WPS No. 238 of 2018

                Sharad Yadav S/o Late Mr. Ramnath Yadav, Aged About 42 Years By
                Occupation Teacher Panchayat (Pti), Govt. H. S. S. Amoda, Block Narharpur,
                Distt. Kanker Chhattisgarh.                                ---- Petitioner

                                                           Versus

             1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural
                Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

             2. Commissioner Cum Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Naya Raipur, District
                Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

             3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Distt. Kanker Chhattisgarh.

                                                                                                ---- Respondents

        -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Petitioner : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate.

For State : Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 10/01/2018

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post.

3. No order as to costs. Sd/-

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit