Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Suman Tuli , New Delhi vs Dcit, Central Circle- 19, New Delhi on 28 January, 2020

              आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,
                          अिधकरण द ली  यायपीठ "ड 
                                               ड ",
                                               ड    द ली म 
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                     DELHI BENCH 'D', NEW DELHI

        सु ी सुषमा चावला, उपा   एवं  ी आर.के. पांडा, लेखा सद  के सम 

            BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, VICE PRESIDENT
                                &
               SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                 आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 3805/Del/2018
                  िनधा रण वष  / Assessment Year: 2012-13


Suman Tuli,
307, Tower No. 17
Heritage City, Gurgaon
Haryana
PAN-ADMPT2203R                                       .............अपीलाथ /Appellant

vs.


DCIT,
Central Circle-19, New Delhi

                                                     ..............ू!यथ /Respondent


अपीलाथ  क" ओर से /Appellant by : None
ू!यथ  क" ओर से /Respondent by : Sh. Saras Kumar, Sr. DR


  सुनवाई क" तार ख /                        घोषणा क" तार ख /
  Date of Hearing :   16.1.2020            Date of Pronouncement: 28.1.2020


                                  आदे श   / ORDER

PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, VP The appeal filed by assessee is against order of CIT(A)-28, New Delhi, dated 19.12.2016 relating to assessment year 2012-13.

आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No:-3805/Del/2018

2. In this appeal, the assessee is aggrieved by the order of CIT(A) for deciding the appeal ex-parte qua the assessee and without going into the merits of the addition.

3. None appeared on behalf of the assessee and we find that the CIT(A) has passed the ex-parte order without allowing sufficient opportunity of hearing and without going into the merits of the case.

4. The learned DR for the Revenue on the other hand pointed out that sufficient opportunity has been afforded to the assessee.

5. We have heard Ld. DR for the Revenue and perused the record. Under the provisions of Section 250(6) of the Income tax Act, 1961 (in short "Act"), it is incumbent upon the CIT(A) to decide the appeal after hearing the parties and state the points for determination, the decision thereon and also the reasons for the decision. While deciding the appeal, CIT(A) has no power to dismiss the appeal for non prosecution by relying on the ratio/s laid down in CIT vs. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another 118 ITR 461 (SC) and Late Tukoji Rao Holker vs. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP). In these facts and circumstances, where the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal by applying the above said ratios, the order of the learned CIT(A) suffers from infirmity. The CIT(A) while deciding the issue on merits have also to give reasons for coming to the conclusion and in the absence of the same, the order of the CIT(A) again suffers from infirmity. In the present appeal, we find that the CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal ex-parte qua the assessee 2 आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No:-3805/Del/2018 and had failed to decide the appeal by passing reasoned assessment order.

6. Accordingly, we set aside the matter back to the file of the CIT(A) with direction to the CIT(A) to decide the issue on merits by a reasoned order, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Further the assessee is also directed to appear before the CIT(A) and participate in the appellate proceedings. The appeal is thus decided on this preliminary issue without going into the merits of the addition.

7. Hence this appeal is restored back to the file of CIT(A) to decide the issue on merits after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to comply with notices issued by the CIT(A). The preliminary issue raised in this appeal is thus decided in favour of assessee. Since the appeal is being decided on the preliminary issue, we are not addressing the issue raised on merit.

8. In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 28th day of January, 2020.

      Sd/-                                                       Sd/-
(R.K. PANDA)                                              (SUSHMA CHOWLA)
लेखा सदःय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                            उपा.य//VICE PRESIDENT
द ली / दनांक Dated : 28th January, 2020.
SH




                                         3
                                                   आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No:-3805/Del/2018




आदे श क" ूितिल0प अमे0षत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to :

1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant
2. ू!यथ / The Respondent
3. आयकर आयु3(अपील) / The CIT(A)
4. मु6य आयकर आयु3 / The Pr. CIT
5. 0वभागीय ूितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, द ली / DR, ITAT, Delhi
6. गाड फाईल / Guard file.

आदे शानुसार/ BY ORDER, स!या0पत ूित //True Copy// सहायक र<जःशार, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण , द ली Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi 4