Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Subanan vs The Inspector Of Police on 8 December, 2023

Author: G.Ilangovan

Bench: G.Ilangovan

                                                                        Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14946 of 2023

                                  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT


                                                      Dated: 08/12/2023
                                                            CORAM
                                           The Hon'ble    Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN


                                                Crl.OP(MD)No.14946 of 2023
                                                            and
                                                Crl.MP(MD)No.11835 of 2023

                     Subanan                                        : Petitioner/A2

                                                             Vs.

                     1.The Inspector of Police,
                       Pazhugal Police Station,
                       Kanyakumari District.
                       (Crime No.212 of 2016)

                     2.Manai @ Mohanan                               : Respondents

                                  PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition has been filed
                     under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call
                     for the records in SC                No.17 of 2022 on the file of the
                     Additional             District     Court,     Kuzhithurai,     Kanyakumari
                     District and quash the same against the petitioner.


                                      For Petitioner        : Mr.Ka.Ramakrishnan

                                         For 1st Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar
                                                              Government Advocate
                                                              (Criminal side)


                                                         O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking quashment of the SC No.17 of 2022 on the file of the Additional District Court, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/5 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14946 of 2023

2.The facts in brief:-

A1 is the wife of the de-facto complainant. The deceased is the son born to them. The second accused and A1 were having illegal intimacy. On 17/11/2016 at about 05.00 pm, the deceased returned to the house from the school. Noticing that house was locked inside, the deceased went to the rear side area. At that time, he found A1 and A2 in a compromising position. Fearing that the deceased will reveal the same to others, both of them decided to kill him. A1 thrusted tablets used for Thyroid ailment forcibly in the mouth of the deceased.

Thereafter, strangulating him by using the dog chain. He was taken to the Parasalai Government Hospital and gave a wrong statement that the deceased consumed tablets. He was taken to further to the Government Hospital, Trivendram. But died, on 18/11/2016 due to the injuries suffered. Upon the occurrence, a case in Crime No.212 of 2016 was registered for the offence under section 174 Cr.P.C @ 201, 302 r/w 34 IPC. After completing the investigation, charge sheet was filed and it was taken cognizance in SC No.17 of 2022 by the Additional District Court, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari district.

3.Seeking quashment of the same, A2 namely Subanan is before this court on the ground that there are https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/5 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14946 of 2023 material contradictions in the materials collected during the court of investigation and the statement recorded.

4.Heard both sides.

5.It is an unfortunate alleged killing of the child of A1. As noted above, it is the case of the prosecution that the deceased happened to be a witness to the illegal intimacy of both the accused in the house, he was done to death.

6.During the course of investigation, sufficient materials are collected and opinion obtained from the Medical Officer, which prima facie shows that the deceased was strangulated to death. Simply because, in the final report, it is stated that strangulation was made by using the dog chain, the petitioner cannot escape from the criminal prosecution.

7.Causing of death is apparent. The reason for the murder is also collected during the course of investigation. So I am not convincing any of the grounds made in this petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14946 of 2023

8.Absolutely, no legal ground has been made. Simply because, there are some contradictions in the prosecution case, it cannot be thrown away at the initial stage.

9.Considering the grievousness of the allegation and the manner in which, the offence said to have been committed, I find no reason to entertain this petition.

10.In the result, this criminal original petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

08/12/2023 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No er To,

1.The Additional District Court, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pazhugal Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/5 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.14946 of 2023 G.ILANGOVAN, J er Crl.OP(MD)No.14946 of 2023 08/12/2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5