Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 13]

Chattisgarh High Court

Umesh Sharma vs State Of Chhattisgarh 19 Wppil/15/2013 ... on 30 August, 2018

Bench: Chief Justice, Sanjay Agrawal

                                          1



                                                                          NAFR
                  HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                              W.P(PIL) No.69 of 2018
   Umesh Sharma S/o Ramawatar Sharma, Aged About 53 Years R/o New
   Baradwar (Muktaraja), Tahsil Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.,
   District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
                                                                   ---- Petitioner
                                      Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, New
   Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. National Highway Authority Of India Through Chairman National Highway
   Authority G - 5 And 6, Sector 10, Dwarika, New Delhi., District : New Delhi,
   Delhi
3. Engineer In Chief National Highway Authority Sirpur Bhavan, Near Kali
   Mandir, Via Governor House Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur,
   Chhattisgarh
4. Executive Engineer National Highway, Korba Road, Champa, District Janjgir
   Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
5. Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-
   Champa, Chhattisgarh
6. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.,
   District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
7. Sub Divisional Officer P.W.D. (N.H.) Champa Division, District Janjgir
   Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh
                                                                ---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri HV Sharma, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 & 3 to 7: Shri YS. Thakur Addl. Advocate General.

For Respondent No.2: Shri Navin Bhakta, Advocate on behalf of Smt Fouzia Mirza, Advocate.

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 30/08/2018

1. Heard.

2

2. Since the grievances raised by the Petitioner can be agitated by the aggrieved persons individually, therefore, this Public Interest Litigation will not be used as a methodology for some kind of gain which the Petitioner would like to make.

3. The same is dismissed.

4. In view of above, IA No.2/2018, an application for exemption from filing the security amount and IA No.3/2018, an application for waiver of the Locus Standi Rule stand dismissed.

                      Sd/-                                                   Sd/-
             (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)                                     (Sanjay Agrawal)
              CHIEF JUSTICE                                                  JUDGE

Priya