Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Deepak Kumar Nanoma vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 September, 2021
Author: Dinesh Mehta
Bench: Dinesh Mehta
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8219/2021
1. Deepak Kumar Nanoma S/o Vasudev Nanoma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 15 Gamda Mod Gowari, Sagwara Dungarpur.
2. Dilip Kumar Roat S/o Ratanlal Roat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Fala Rajgadi Doja, Dungapur.
3. Deepesh Joshi S/o Vasudev Joshi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vpo Jogpur, Cheentri, Chitri, Dungarpur.
4. Baluprasad Kharadi S/o Badri Prasad Kharadi, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Uniya, Post Reta, Dungarpur.
5. Sanjay Nanoma S/o Mohanlal Nanoma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Talaiya Teh. Bichhiwara, Dis. Dungarpur.
6. Asmita Kumari Nanoma D/o Chetanlal Nanoma, Aged About 28 Years, Ward No. 9, Mu. Post Garduna, Garduna Dungarpur.
7. Anita Kumari Roat D/o Vakta Damor, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Bayoda, Hirata, Heeratan, Antri, Dungarpur.
8. Ashok Kumar Meena S/o Ramanlal Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/s Thathua Fala, Mukam Post Jogpur, Cheentri Dist. Dungarpur.
9. Bhagwatilal Meghwal S/o Saviya Meghwal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 96 Gadanathaji Meghwal Basti, Village Aspur, Dist. Dungarpur.
10. Shubham Bhoi S/o Laljee Bhoi, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Nai Basti, Village Aspur, Dist. Dungarpur.
11. Yogendra Kumar S/o Shivlal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Patali, Village Patali, Dist. Dungarpur.
12. Ravi Kumar Ganchha S/o Heeralal Ganchha, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Vpo Gamdi Teh. Sabla, Dist. Dungarpur.
13. Reena Roat D/o Prabhulal Roat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Ambara, Dist. Dungapur.
14. Chandulal Roat S/o Heri Shanker Roat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, Mukam Dol Kungela, Post Surata Jhothari, Dist. Dungarpur.
15. Ravindra Koted S/o Laxman Koted, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Pall Deval Dungarpur Gogara Fala, Village Paldewal Dist. Dungarpur.
16. Yogesh Balai S/o Ramanlal Balai, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vpo Jogpur, Cheetri, Chitri Dist. Dungarpur.
17. Bindu D/o Bhairavlal Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Mukam, Kushal Magri, Post Biladi Dist. Dungarpur.
18. Jayesh Kumar Khant S/o Arvind Khant, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Gadiya Bhadar, Post Dhambola, Teh. Simlwara, Dist. Dungarpur.
(Downloaded on 07/09/2021 at 09:13:37 PM)(2 of 5) [CW-8219/2021]
19. Sanjay Kumar Damor S/o Ramlal Damor, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village, Post Vagdari, Teh. Dungarpur Dist. Dungapur.
20. Dimpal Khant D/o Shanker Lal Roat, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Mukam Post Pall Deval, Fala Limdi Bhatda Dist. Dungarpur.
21. Nitesh Yadav S/o Narendra Kumar Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Mukam Post Varda, Village Varda Dist. Dungarpur.
22. Vishal Kumar Yadav S/o Shakerlal Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gram Bhiluda, Jethana (Rural) Jethana, Dist. Dungarpur.
23. Priyanka Kumari D/o Motilal Parmar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Dhambola Dist. Dungarpur.
24. Susheela Kumari Damor D/o Gatulal Damor, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 3 Tamboliya Village Sakarsi, Dungarpur.
25. Rajesh Kumar Ahari S/o Dhuleshwar Ahari, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 10 Post Sankarsi Teh. Simalwara Dist. Dungarpur.
26. Bholeshwar Roat S/o Ramesh Chandra, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 9 Mukam Post Malmatha, Panchayat Samiti Bichhiwara, Dist. Dungarpur.
27. Jaypal Dodiyar S/o Harishanker Dodiyar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Village Ghooghra, Dungarpur Dist. Dungarpur.
28. Rajesh Kumar Yadav S/o Kanu Yadav, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 472, Village Vedsa, Teh. Simalwara, Ward No. 3, Dist. Dungarpur.
29. Shakuntala Nanoma D/o Deeta Roat, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Nanoda Post Dhambola, Simalwara Nanoda Dungarpur.
30. Rinku Kumari Panchal D/o Mangi Lal Panchal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Reenchha, Dungarpur.
31. Asha Kumar Ahari D/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Devla Dungarpur.
32. Abhishek Yadav S/o Kurichand Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vpo Galiakot, Yadav Basti Juitali Galiakot, Dist. Dungarpur.
33. Avinash Yadav S/o Kurichand Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Galiakot, Yadav Basti Juitali Galiakot, Dist. Dungarpur.
34. Jayanti Lal Rayak S/o Ramji Rayak, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Vagdari Post Khempur Dist. Dungarpur.
35. Nikesh Vasita S/o Ramnik Lal Vasita, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Housing Board, Dungarpur.
36. Keshavlal Damor S/o Kantilal Damor, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Post Vagadri Vaya Pal Dewal Dist. Dungarpur.
(Downloaded on 07/09/2021 at 09:13:37 PM)(3 of 5) [CW-8219/2021]
37. Mahendra Meena S/o Anand Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Shivrajpur Post Samaliya Teh. Sagawara Dist. Dungarpur.
38. Lalita Kumari Damor D/o Manilal Damor, Aged About 27 Years, Village Post Decha, Teh. Sagawara, Dist. Dungarpur.
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Mission Director, National Rural Health Mission, Swasthaya Bhawan Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Rituraj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Ms. Vandana Bhansali JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 07/09/2021
1. The petitioners applied for the post of CHO (Community Health Officer) on contractual basis, pursuant to recruitment notification dated 31.08.2020.
2. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners have raised a grievance that despite being higher in merit, they have been posted outside TSP area, whereas the persons lesser meritorious to them have been given posting in Dungarpur, which is TSP area.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that as per the terms of the advertisement and the rules governing the field the respondents were required to provide posting to the petitioners on the basis of Merit-cum-preference, as is evident from condition No.15 of the recruitment notification dated 31.08.2020 and the same has not been done.
(Downloaded on 07/09/2021 at 09:13:37 PM)(4 of 5) [CW-8219/2021]
4. Ms. Vandana Bhansali, learned counsel for the respondent-
State at the outset submitted that true it is, that the petitioners have been asked to discharge their duties outside TSP area, but all the selected candidates have been deployed under an ad-hoc arrangement, as and where required.
5. While highlighting that petitioners are yet to complete their bridge course, learned counsel for the respondents invited Court's attention towards the order dated 10.05.2021, issued by the Special Secretary, Medical & Health and Project Director, NHM, particularly para No.2 and 6 of the order aforesaid and argued that posting will be given once the State is in a position to hold bridge course for them.
6. Para No.2 and 6 of the order dated 10.05.2021 reads thus:-
"2- mijksDr p;u lwph esa lfEefyr vH;fFkZ;ksa dh lsok;sa fpfdRlk ,oa LokLF; foHkkx ds i= Øekad i-1¼1½fpLok@xqzi&2@2020 fnukad 27-04-2021 esa of.kZr "krksZ ds v/khu ftyk LokLF; lfefr ds ek/;e ls foRr foHkkx }kjk fu/kkZfjr "krksZ ds vuqlkj orZeku dksfoM ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f'Vxr j[krs gq, rRdky izHkko ls vfxze vkns"kksas rd dksjksuk ok;jl COVID-19 ds fu;U=.k dk;ksZ gsrq layXu lwph ds vuqlkj vLFkkbZ :i ls eq[; fpfdRlk ,oa LokLF; vf/kdkjh dks lkSaih tkrh gSA mDr vH;fFkZ;ksa dks bl vof/k esa ,u,p,e ds th,u,e in gsrq ihvkbZih esa Lohd`r lesfdr ekuns; 7900 :- izfrekg ns; gksxk blds vfrfjDr vU; dksbZ foRrh; ifjykHk ns; ugha gksxsaA lacaf/kr lh,e,pvks bl ekuns; dk Hkqxrku DBT ds ek/;e ls Hkkjr ljdkj ls dksfoM&19 ds Lis"ky ctV (B 31.4) esa izkIr jkf"k ls fd;k tk;sxkA bu vH;fFkZ;ksa dks dk;Zxzg.k djus gsrq dksbZ ;k=k HkRrk ns; ugha gSA 6- mijksDr vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy, lafonk lh,pvks HkrhZ&2020 dh foKfIr esa of.kZr "krksZ ds v/khu fu/kkZfjr Bridge Programme Certificate (Course) in Community Health for Nurses dkslZ gsrq izf"k{k.k ifjfLFkfr;ka lkekU; gksus ij vk;ksftr fd;k tk;sxk] ftls lQyrkiwoZd mRrh.kZ djus okys vH;fFkZ;ksa dks mudh esfjV ds vk/kkj ij ftyk vkaofVr fd;k tkdj lafonk lh,pvks ds in ij fu;qfDr (Downloaded on 07/09/2021 at 09:13:37 PM) (5 of 5) [CW-8219/2021] vkfn dh dk;Zokgh dk fu.kZ; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds lkekU; gksus ds ckn fy;k tkosxkA"
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the stand of the Sate that petitioner and other candidates have been deployed to meet with the situation arising on account of spread of COVID-19 and their posting will be given once their bridge course is over, this Court does not find it a case worth warranting interference of this Court.
8. Needless to observe that once the bridge course is over and other candidates are given posting, the same be done in terms of condition No.15 of the recruitment notification dated 31.08.2020.
9. Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DINESH MEHTA),J 25-Ramesh/-
(Downloaded on 07/09/2021 at 09:13:37 PM)Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)