Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Kumar Alias Kummya vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 July, 2025

                                               -1-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC-D:8805
                                                        CRL.P No. 102216 of 2025


                   HC-KAR




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                      DHARWAD BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

                            CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102216 OF 2025
                                 (439 OF Cr.PC/483 OF BNSS)

                   BETWEEN:

                   KUMAR @ KUMMYA
                   S/O. RAMANNA MADIVALR,
                   AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER,
                   R/O. CHIKURU, NOW AT: RUGI,
                   TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587313.
                                                                    ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SHRI R. H. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                   (KARATAGI POLCIE STAION)
                   R/BY. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Digitally signed   HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
by RAKESH S        DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-580011.
HARIHAR
Location: High
Court of                                                           ...RESPONDENT
Karnataka,         (BY SHRI ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP)
Dharwad Bench

                         THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF
                   CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE
                   PRESENT PETITIONER WHO IS ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.2 IN
                   S.C.NO.83/2022, ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
                   SESSIONS JUDGE, KOPPAL (SITTING AT GANGAVATHI) IN
                   CONNECTION     WITH    KARATAGI    POLICE   STATION   CRIME
                   NO.207/2020, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER
                   SECTION 302, 307, 109, R/W. 149 OF IPC, BY ALLOWING THIS
                   PETITION, TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.

                         THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ARGUMENTS, THIS
                   DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                   -2-
                                                  NC: 2025:KHC-D:8805
                                          CRL.P No. 102216 of 2025


HC-KAR




                              RAL ORDER

   (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T)


    Heard Sri R.H.Angadi, learned counsel for the petitioner

- accused No.2 and Sri Abhishek Malipatil, learned High

Court Government Pleader for respondent - State.


    2.        This petition is filed under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C." for short) (under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023)    by    the      accused   to    enlarge    him   on   bail   in

SC.No.83/2022 on the file of learned Additional District and

Sessions Judge, Koppal (sitting at Gangavathi).


    3.        Brief facts of the case of the prosecution are as

under:


    The first informant Sri Bheemanna son of Chatrappa

Megur, a police constable filed a complaint before the

respondent Police, alleging that when he was on patrolling

duty at Karatagi City Old Bus Stand, he received credible

information     that,    in   Channabasaveshwara         Nagar   near

Pannapur road of Karatagi, some unknown persons have
                                    -3-
                                                  NC: 2025:KHC-D:8805
                                         CRL.P No. 102216 of 2025


HC-KAR




committed murder of a lady and assaulted a person and ran

away from the place of incident. Hence, he immediately

rushed to the said place and found a dead body and injured

person. After enquiry, he came to know the name of

deceased as Triveni and the name of injured as Vinod Malali.

Thereafter, he shifted the injured person to the Hospital.

During the course of investigation, names of the petitioner

and other accused persons were disclosed. Hence, the

Investigating Officer arrested all the accused persons and in

turn, they were remanded to the Judicial Custody. Hence,

the petitioner - accused No.2 is in judicial custody since

25.08.2022.


       4.   The learned counsel for the petitioner - accused

No.2     contended   that,   the    petitioner/    accused   No.2   is

innocent of the alleged offences. He has not committed any

offences as alleged. The petitioner is affected with HIV

positive. If he remained in the prison, the other prisoners

may get affected with the virus of HIV. The petitioner

/accused No.2 is ready to abide by the conditions that may

be imposed by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner
                                 -4-
                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:8805
                                        CRL.P No. 102216 of 2025


 HC-KAR




further contended that, the material eyewitnesses i.e. PWs.5

to 8 have not supported the case of the prosecution. Further,

CW.42/Vinod Malali, as an injured eyewitness has not

examined before the Trial Court and further trial of the case

is stalled by CW.42, as he sought further investigation in the

matter. On all these grounds he prayed for grant of bail. The

counsel furnished medical records and the petitioner, issued

by the Prison authority


        5.    The learned High Court Government Pleader

contended that, the petitioner is involved in the offence

under Section 302 of IPC and there is a prima facie case

against him. If the petitioner/accused No.2 is released on

bail,    he   may   tamper   with     the   prosecution   witnesses.

Considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the

petitioner is not entitled to grant bail, hence he prayed for

rejection of petition.


        6.    Perused the material available on record. As per

the charge sheet material, the petitioner and others made

criminal conspiracy and assaulted the deceased Triveni and
                                   -5-
                                                  NC: 2025:KHC-D:8805
                                          CRL.P No. 102216 of 2025


HC-KAR




CW.42/Vinod Malali injured eyewitness with talwar, clubs and

etc.


       7.     Now the petitioner/accused No.2 sought for bail

on the ground of medical illness i.e., the petitioner is tested

HIV positive. Perused the medical report furnished by the

prison authorities i.e., National AIDS Control Organization,

Laboratory Test Report. As per the report dated 20.01.2023,

the doctors opined that "Specimen is positive for HIV-1

antibodies, thus, the petitioner tested HIV positive.


       8.     It appears that, the petitioner - accused No.2 is

suffering from HIV positive since many years and it may get

affected to other prisoners in the prison. If HIV is not

effectively managed, there is a risk of transmission to the

other inmates. The petitioner required immediate treatment

and ongoing medical care. Thus, being HIV positive in prison

can    lead   to   significant   challenges,      including   increased

stigma, discrimination, and potential barriers to accessing

health care and treatment. Having regard to the facts and

circumstances      of   the   case,     looking   to   the    nature   of
                                 -6-
                                                    NC: 2025:KHC-D:8805
                                           CRL.P No. 102216 of 2025


HC-KAR




allegations made against the petitioner and fact that the

petitioner is affected with HIV positive, it is just and

necessary to grant bail in favour of the petitioner. On these

grounds, the petition is liable to be allowed. Accordingly, this

Court proceed to pass the following:


                               ORDER

The criminal petition is hereby allowed. The petitioner/accused No.2 is ordered to be released on bail in S.C.No.83/2022 pending on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Koppal (Sitting at Gangavathi) on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner/accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
(ii) The petitioner - accused shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses and shall not threaten the eyewitnesses.
(iii) The petitioner - accused shall appear before the Trial Court regularly without fail.
-7-

NC: 2025:KHC-D:8805 CRL.P No. 102216 of 2025 HC-KAR

(iv) The petitioner/accused shall not involve in any similar offences.

Violation of any of the above conditions shall entitle the prosecution to seek cancellation of bail before the appropriate Court in accordance with law. NOTE: The above observation made in this petition is only for the purpose of disposal of this petition.

Sd/-

(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE EM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15