Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

P Dayanand vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara on 14 March, 2022

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                         1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022

                      BEFORE

         THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R DEVDAS

     WRIT PETITION NO.7472 OF 2016 (S-PRO)

BETWEEN

1.    P DAYANAND
      AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
      S/O LATE PUTTARAJU
      WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER
      AT THE OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR
      (TOWN PLANNING -NORTH)
      BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE
      HEAD OFFICE, N R SQUARE
      HUDSON CIRCLE
      BENGALURU - 560002

2.    B R RANGANATH
      AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
      S/O PAMPANNA
      WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER
      AT THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT
      EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
      BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
      PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA,
      HMT LAYOUT BENGALURU - 560073

3.    R RAGHAVENDRA
      AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
      S/O LATE M RAJANNA
      WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER
      AT THE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
      (SWM)
      BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
      NEAR TOWN HALL CIRCLE,
                         2




      DASAPPA HOSPITAL CAMPUS
      BENGALURU - 560002          ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. REUBEN JACOB, SENIOR COUNSEL, FOR
    SRI. PAVAN KUMAR M. N, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.    BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA
      PALIKE
      REPRESENTED BY
      ITS COMMISSIONER
      N R SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560002

2.    DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ADMN)
      BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA
      PALIKE, N R SQUARE
      BENGALURU - 560002

3.    CHETAN H.D
      S/O H.C.DIVAKAR
      AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
      WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER I
      IN THE OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC
      ENGINEERING CELL
      ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
      N.R.SQUARE, HEAD OFFICE, BBMP
      BANGALORE.

4.    UDHAY CHOUGALE
      S/O GINAPPA CHOUGALE
      AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
      WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER
      ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
      BBMP, BENGALURU-560002

5.    SANTOSH KUMAR.M.
      S/O M.MALLEGOWDA
      AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
      WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER
                          3




      OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT
      EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
      WHITEFIELD SUB-DIVISION
      BBMP, BENGALURU

6.    H.K.THIPPESHA
      S/O KUMARAIAH,
      AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
      WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR
      TOWN PLANNING (NORTH)
      BBMP, BENGALURU-560002

7.    GURUPRASAD M.V.
      S/O B.VIJAYA KUMAR
      AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
      WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF ADTP, MAHADEVAPURA
      WHITEFIELD, BBMP
      BENGALURU

8.    PUNEETH H.M.
      AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
      S/O H.B. MALLESH
      ASSISTANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF THE ADTP WEST ZONE
      BBMP, SAMPIGE ROAD
      MALLESHWARAM
      BANGALORE

9.    SHREETEJ V.S
      AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
      S/O LATE V.R. SATHYANARAYANA
      ASSISTANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF THE ADP
      RR NAGAR ZONE
      BBMP BANGALORE

10.   PRAKASH K.S
      AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
      S/O SOMEGOWDA
                          4




      ASSISATANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF THE ADTP
      YELAHANKA ZONE
      BBMP, AMRUTHAHALLI MAIN ROAD
      BANGALORE

11.   SUDHAKAR REDDY
      AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
      S/O MAREDDY K.N
      ASSISTANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF THE ADTP,
      BOMANAHALLI ZONE
      BBMP, BEGUR MAIN ROAD
      BANGALORE

12.   RAJANNA
      AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
      S/O BOMMEGOWDA
      ASSISTANT ENGINEER
      OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT
      EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
      BBMP, J.C. NAGAR SUB-DIVISION
      MR PALYA, HEBBAL
      BANGALORE

13.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
      DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
      VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001
      REPRESENTED BY ITS
      ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY
                                  ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.K.N. PHANINDRA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR)
    SRI. B.S. GAUTHAM, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)
    SRI. K.C. SHANTHA KUMAR, ADVOCATE
    FOR R8 TO R12
    SRI. ABHINAV.R, ADVOCATE & SRI. DEEPAK D.C,
    ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R7)
    SMT. M.C.NAGASHREE, AGA FOR R13)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
                                    5




226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO
PROMOTIONS TO THE CADRE OF ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER IN THE R-1 PALIKE AND ETC.,

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                              ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

Learned Senior Counsel Sri Reuben Jacob, appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners who are admittedly Diploma Holders, joined services of the respondent-BBMP and were promoted as Junior Engineers.

2. On the other hand, the contesting respondents contend that they were directly appointed as Assistant Engineers having requisite educational qualification of Bachelor of Engineering.

3. The dispute in this writ petition is regarding promotional avenue to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineer. This writ petition was filed in the year 2016 and the Rules governing the promotions 6 were contained in the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Rules, 1977 and 1999. Nevertheless, during the course of these proceedings, the Rules have been amended and the BBMP (General) C & R of Officers and Employees Rules, 2020 have been brought into existence. In view of the amended Rules, certain directions were issued by this Court, having regard to the fact that two separate cadres were created for Diploma Holders, on one hand, and for those having the Bachelor of Engineering Degrees. Provision is made for promotion of an Assistant Engineer who has a Bachelor Degree of Engineering to be promoted as Assistant Executive Engineer-I. On the other hand, a separate provision is made for promotion of Junior Engineer having Diploma to be promoted as Assistant Engineer-II and thereafter, Assistant Engineer-II to be promoted as Assistant Executive Engineer-II. This Court also noticed the fact that the new Rules were brought in place consequent to the observations and 7 directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.A.Nos.1837-1842/2020 dated 27.02.2020.

4. Even after the new Rules were brought into force, there was some controversy in the matter of interpretation of the percentage of posts to be divided between Assistant Executive Engineer-I and Assistant Executive Engineer-II. Therefore, by order dated 25.02.2021, this Court modified the earlier order and directed the BBMP-respondent to grant promotions to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer (Civil) Division-I from the cadre of Assistant Engineer Division-I excluding three posts, which were to be filled up subject to further orders being passed in the writ petition.

5. Learned Senior Counsel Sri Reuben Jacob, submits that there is a further development after having noticed the controversy regarding the division of the said posts and the Government has issued a Government Order dated 18.01.2022 enhancing the 8 number of posts for Assistant Executive Engineer (Civil) Division-I to 137 and posts of Assistant Executive Engineers (Civil) Division-II to 17. With this, the learned Senior Counsel submits that there is room for all the petitioners for being considered to the said posts and therefore the learned Senior Counsel submits that the earlier order may be modified taking into consideration the enhancement of the number of posts and the writ petition may be disposed of.

6. At this juncture, the learned Counsels for the contesting respondents have brought to the notice of this Court that the BBMP has been ignoring the minimum requirement of educational qualification even for the post of Assistant Engineer-II and Assistant Executive Engineer (Civil) Division-II.

7. However, learned Senior Counsel Sri Reuben Jacob, would contend that earlier there was no such requirement and however, in the present set of Rules, if there is any requirement of such minimum 9 educational qualification, it is for the BBMP to take care of those aspects.

8. Having regard to the submissions made at the bar, this Court proceeds to pass the following :

ORDER
i) The writ petition is partly allowed.
ii) The interim orders passed earlier by this Court and more particularly, the interim orders dated 25.02.2021 and 22.04.2021 are clarified herein while permitting the respondent-BBMP to consider the claim of all such eligible Assistant Engineers-II (Diploma Holders) to the post of Assistant Executive Engineers (Civil) Division-II.
iii) The directions given earlier reserving three posts or nine posts stand modified while permitting the BBMP and State Government to consider the claim of all the eligible Assistant Engineers-II to the post of Assistant Executive Engineers (Civil) Division-II. The communication dated 02.03.2022 made by the Additional Chief 10 Secretary, Urban Development Department to the Chief Commissioner, BBMP with reference to the interim orders dated 25.02.2021 and 22.04.2021 also stand clarified accordingly.

9. Consequently, the BBMP is directed to send its recommendation to the State Government and the State Government shall consider the case of all such eligible Assistant Engineers-II for promotion to the cadre of Assistant Executive Engineers (Civil) Division- II, as expeditiously as possible.

In view of the disposal of the writ petition, all pending I.As. do not survive for consideration and accordingly the same stand disposed of.

Learned AGA is permitted to file Memo of Appearance within a period of four weeks from today.

Sd/-

JUDGE JT/-