Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Ravi Diwakar vs State Of U.P. on 22 March, 2021

Author: Vivek Kumar Singh

Bench: Vivek Kumar Singh





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 67
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14804 of 2021
 

 
Applicant :- Ravi Diwakar
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Dubey
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
 

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the record.

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He is innocent and has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that there is no explosive substance either is recovered from the possession of the applicant or his pointing out any explosive substance was found by the Investigating Officer, the said fact has been mentioned in para 11 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. The applicant is languishing in jail since 30.01.2021. He undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted, therefore, he may be released on bail.

Learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

Let the applicant- Ravi Diwakar involved in Case Crime No. 21 of 2021, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 380, 427 IPC and 3/5 Explosive Substance Act and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Kalyanpur, District Kanpur Nagar be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:

1. The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

Order Date :- 22.3.2021 Arti