Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Jagdev Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 November, 2020

Author: Hari Pal Verma

Bench: Hari Pal Verma

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA


                            AT CHANDIGARH



                                           Criminal Misc. No.M-35966 of 2020
                                                 Date of Decision: 11.11.2020
Jagdev Singh
                                                               ...Petitioner (s)
                                     Versus
State of Punjab
                                                              ...Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA

Present:-   Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate
            for the petitioner.

            Mr. Mehardeep Singh, Addl..A.G., Punjab.
            *****

HARI PAL VERMA, J. (Oral)

The matter has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing due to outbreak of COVID-19.

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.50 dated 28.04.2020 under Sections 376 IPC and Sections 6 and 21 POCSO Act (Sections 363, 366 IPC and 376-D IPC, Section 21 POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(5) of the SC/ST Act being added later on and Section 376 being deleted) registered at Police Station Anandpur Sahib, District Rupnagar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that except that the petitioner is owner of Jagdev Guest House, there is no allegation of sexual assault against him and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The main accused Manish Kumar has already been released on bail, 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 12-11-2020 00:35:43 ::: Criminal Misc. No.M-35966 of 2020 -2- being a juvenile. Moreover, the alleged occurrence has taken place on 16.03.2020 whereas the present FIR was registered on 28.04.2020 and there is no plausible explanation for delay in lodging the FIR. He further submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the complainant has also submitted an affidavit Annexure P-2 in this regard. The petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2020.

Learned State counsel does not dispute the custody of the petitioner and submits that there is no allegation against the petitioner of commission of sexual assault upon the prosecutrix.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Admittedly, the allegation of commission of sexual assault is upon the main accused Manish Kumar, who is stated to be on bail, being a juvenile. Considering the affidavit Annexure P-2, wherein it has been stated that the name of Gurdev Guest House has been mentioned in the complaint due to some misunderstanding and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2020, this Court deems it appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted on regular bail, subject to furnishing of his bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

November 11, 2020                               ( HARI PAL VERMA )
AK                                                    JUDGE
Whether speaking / reasoned?                            Yes / No
Whether reportable?                                     Yes / No




                                  2 of 2
               ::: Downloaded on - 12-11-2020 00:35:43 :::