Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Wadla Bheemaraidu vs The State Of Telangana on 10 August, 2022

Author: Dinesh Maheshwari

Bench: Dinesh Maheshwari

     ITEM NO.14                                COURT NO.12                         SECTION II

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5781/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-03-2019
     in CRLA No. 1078/2016 passed by the High Court For The State Of
     Telangana At Hyderabad)

     WADLA BHEEMARAIDU                                                        Petitioner(s)
                                                      VERSUS
     STATE OF TELANGANA                                                       Respondent(s)

     (IA No. 84331/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION
     IA No. 83418/2022 - GRANT OF BAIL)

     Date : 10-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. A. Sirajudeen, Sr. Adv.
                                        Ms. Manjeet Chawla, AOR
                                        Mr. Yashvardhan S. Soam, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                  Ms.   Bina Madhavan, Adv.
                                        Mr.   S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR
                                        Mr.   Sweena Nair, Adv.
                                        Mr.   P. Mohith Rao, Adv.

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

We have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length. During the course of submissions, the requirement of examining the record was felt, particularly in relation to the exhibits marked in the trial. Therefore, the hearing remained inconclusive.

Send for the record immediately from the High Court and the Trial Court.

Signature Not Verified

List the matter for further hearing on 06.09.2022. Digitally signed by Indu Marwah Date: 2022.08.10 18:16:32 IST Reason:

     (SHRADDHA MISHRA)                                                  (RANJANA SHAILEY)
     SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                                          COURT MASTER (NSH)