Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

V.I.Thankappan vs State Of Kerala on 21 January, 2019

Author: P.Ubaid

Bench: P.Ubaid

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                           PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID

    MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2019/1ST MAGHA, 1940

                    Crl.MC.No.193 of 2019

      ORDER IN Crl.M.P.899/2015 IN CC 33/2011 of ENQUIRY
      COMMISSIONER & SPL.JUDGE, THRISSUR DATED 22.1.2016
    ORDER IN Crl.M.C.3294/2016 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
                        DATED 7.10.2016
   ORDER IN Crl.M.P.198/2017 IN C.C.33/2011 OF THE ENQUIRY
    COMMISSIONER & SPECIAL JUDGE, THRISSUR DATED 29.4.2017
                       ---------------

PETITIONER/ACCUSED :-


            V.I.THANKAPPAN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O.IYPE,
            VADAKKEPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHAKKAMTHARA,
            GANDHINAGAR, PALAKKAD.

            BY ADVS.SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR
                    SMT.V.SHYLAJA


RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE :-


      1     STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

      2     SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
            VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU SPECIAL
            CELL, ERNAKULAM - 682 011.

            BY SRI.A.RAJESH (SPL.PP FOR VACB)


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.01.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.MC.No.193/2019

                                       -: 2 :-



                                O R D E R

The petitioner herein is the accused in C.C.33/2011 of the Special Court (Vigilance), Thrissur. He has been facing charge under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (the PC Act)(as it stood prior to the amendment of 2018). During the investigation process, some vehicle documents and also the petitioner's title deed relating to a property were seized by the Investigating Officer. He approached the trial court with Crl.M.P.899/2015 with a prayer to release the documents. On 22.1.2016, the learned trial Judge ordered to release the documents on condition that the petitioner shall furnish bank guarantee for Rs.10 lakhs. The said order was modified by this Court as per the order dated 7.10.2016 in Crl.M.C.3294/2016, reducing the amount of bank guarantee to Rs.5 lakhs. Later, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.198/2017 before the trial court for a clarification as to in whose favour the Crl.MC.No.193/2019 -: 3 :- bank guarantee should be furnished. The learned trial Judge passed orders on 29.4.2017 in the said application clarifying that the bank guarantee shall be furnished in favour of the State of Kerala represented by the District Collector, Thrissur. In paragraph 6 of the said order, the learned trial Judge has recorded that during enquiry, the learned counsel for the petitioner had volunteered that the petitioner would produce certified copies of the document, and that he would produce the originals as and when required by the court. The petitioner is aggrieved by the said observation, which may later be interpreted as a direction to produce the documents.

2. In the first order releasing the documents, the court has not made such a direction. The documents have been ordered to be released on furnishing bank guarantee. The petitioner has already furnished bank guarantee as modified by this Court. Of course, if the court requires the original documents later, the court can make such a direction. That is within the powers of the court. At this Crl.MC.No.193/2019 -: 4 :- stage, there is no necessity of directing the petitioner to produce the original documents. Such a direction, if felt necessary, can be made subject to the result of the trial. To that extent, the said observation will stand modified.

This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

P.UBAID JUDGE Jvt/21.1.2019 Crl.MC.No.193/2019 -: 5 :- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :-

ANNEXURE-A THE TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED BEARING NO.3528/2003 OF CHITTOOR SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE.
ANNEXURE-B TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED BEARING NO.1340/2004 OF CHITTOR SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE.
ANNEXURE-C TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED BEARING NO.1341/2004 OF CHITTOR SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE.
ANNEXURE-D TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL. MP NO. 899/15 IN CC 33/11 ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER AND SUB JUDGE, THRISSUR, DATED 22/01/2016.
ANNEXURE-F TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL MC NO.3294/2016 BEFORE HIGH COURT OF KEALA DATED 07/10/2016.
ANNEXURE-G TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL. MP NO.198/17 IN CC 33/11 BEFORE THE ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL JUDGE, THRISSUR DATED 29/04/2017.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES :-        NIL



                            //TRUE COPY//

                            P.A. TO JUDGE