Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

M/S Apl Apollo Tubes Ltd vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Thr. Its ... on 18 March, 2026

Author: Aravind Kumar

Bench: Aravind Kumar

                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4953/2012




     M/S APL APOLLO TUBES LTD.                                APPELLANT


                                       VERSUS




     STATE OF U.P THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ANR.               RESPONDENTS

                                       WITH

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4957/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4958/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4965/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4968/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4967/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4959/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4960/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4973/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4970/2012

                         CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4961-4964/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4971/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4972/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4955/2012

                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4966/2012
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
NEHA GUPTA
Date: 2026.03.24
                           CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4954/2012
11:07:22 IST
Reason:




                                         1
                                 O R D E R



1.   Heard.

2.   The   appeals   are   dismissed   as    having    been   rendered   as

infructuous. It is needless to state that the interim order(s), if

any passed, stands dissolved.



                                                      .................J.
                                                          (ARAVIND KUMAR)




                                                       .................J.
                                                      (PRASANNA B. VARALE)


NEW DELHI;
MARCH 18, 2026.




                                   2
ITEM NO.102                 COURT NO.16              SECTION III-A

               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                   Civil Appeal No(s).4953/2012

M/S APL APOLLO TUBES LTD.                              Appellant(s)

                                  VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ANR.             Respondent(s)

WITH

C.A. No. 4957/2012 (III-A)
FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 9499/2022
FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION ON IA 83063/2022
IA No. 9499/2022 - ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES
IA No. 83063/2022 - WITHDRAWAL OF CASE / APPLICATION

C.A. No. 4958/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4965/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4968/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4967/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4959/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4960/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4973/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4970/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4961-4964/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4971/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4972/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4955/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4966/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 4954/2012 (III-A)

C.A. No. 1581/2018 (III-A)

Date : 18-03-2026 This appeal was called on for hearing today.


                                   3
CORAM :   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE

For Appellant(s) :   Mr. Vivek Gupta, AOR
                     Mr. Saurabh Ajay Gupta, AOR

                     Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AOR
                     Ms. Kanishka Mittal, Adv.
                     Ms. Deepti Rathi, Adv.
                     Ms. Upasna Agrawal, Adv.

                     Mr. R.s.sharma, Adv.
                     Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR
                     Ms. Alka Goyal, Adv.
                     Ms. Nandita Sharma, Adv.

                     Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, AOR
                     Mr. Siddharth Sinha, Adv.
                     Mrs. Garima Gupta, Adv.

                     Mr. Dhruv Agarwal, Sr. Adv.
                     Mr. Shwetank Sailakwal, Adv.
                     Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, AOR
                     Mr. Mayank Suryan, Adv.
                     Mr. Alok Mishra, Adv.

                     Mr. K.C. Kaushik, Adv.
                     Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, AOR
                     Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Adv.
                     Mr. Naman Kamboj, Adv.
                     Mr. Shivam Parashar, Adv.
                     Mr. Utsav Madan, Adv.

                     M/S. K J John And Co, AOR
                     Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Adv.
                     Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv.
                     Mr. Shreyash Kumar, Adv.
                     Mr. Sidharth Nair, Adv.
                     Mr. Harshit Singh, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.
                    Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, AOR
                    Mr. Nishant Singh, Adv.
                    Mr. J Tarun Kumar, Adv.
                    Mr. Souvik Singh, Adv.
                    Mr. Narendra Pandey, Adv.

                     Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Adv.
                     Mr. Adarsh Aggarwal, Adv.
                     Mr. Rajan Narain, AOR

                     Mr. Dhruv Agrawal, Sr. Adv.


                                  4
                          Mr. Nishit Agrawal, AOR
                          Ms. Kanishka Mittal, Adv.
                          Ms. Deepti Rathi, Adv.

              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                 O R D E R

C.A. No.4953/2012, C.A. No.4957/2012, C.A. No.4958/2012, C.A. No.4965/2012, C.A. No.4968/2012, C.A. No.4967/2012, C.A. No.4959/2012, C.A. No.4960/2012, C.A. No.4973/2012, C.A. No.4970/2012, C.A. Nos.4961-4964/2012, C.A. No.4971/2012, C.A. No.4972/2012, C.A. No.4955/2012, C.A. No.4966/2012, C.A. No.4954/2012:

The appeals are dismissed as having been rendered as infructuous in terms of the signed order placed on the file.
C.A. No. 1581/2018:
The pendency of the present proceedings would not come in the way of the High Court adjudicating Writ Tax No.757/2018 and connected matters.
List on 08.04.2026.
  (NEHA GUPTA)                                                 (AVGV RAMU)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                           COURT MASTER (NSH)




                                            5