Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Assistant Director Directorate Of ... vs Anand Sharma on 5 April, 2021

Bench: Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy

     ITEM NO.15                       Court 7 (Video Conferencing)                    SECTION II

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)                             No(s).      609/2021

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-03-2020
     in SBCRMBA No. 2966/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature For
     Rajasthan At Jaipur)

     ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT                                  Petitioner(s)

                                                            VERSUS

     ANAND SHARMA                                   Respondent(s)
     (FOR I.R. and IA No.8473/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE
     IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )

     Date : 05-04-2021                      This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
                                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

     For Petitioner(s)                      Mr.   S.P.V. Raju, ASG
                                            Mr.   Abhishek Kumar, Adv.
                                            Ms.   Sairica Raju, Adv.
                                            Mr.   Rahul Mishra, Adv.
                                            Mr.   M.K. Maroria, AOR
                                            Mr.   B. Krishna Prasad, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

                                                        O R D E R

Mr. S.V. Raju, learned ASG appearing for the petitioner submits that the High Court, while granting bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, has not adverted to amended Section 45 of the Act. He submits that there ought to have been a finding as per amended Section 45 of the Act before releasing the accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI KOHLI Date: 2021.04.05

Issue notice.

17:03:35 IST

Reason:

     (MEENAKSHI KOHLI)                                                          (RENU KAPOOR)
     ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                                     BRANCH OFFICER