Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Balaji vs The District Collector on 16 July, 2025

                                                                                       WP No. 1891 of 2025




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 16-07-2025

                                                         CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA

                                                WP No. 1891 of 2025
                Balaji
                S/o.Vijayaraj, Plot No.2, Sakthi Sai
                Ram, 2nd Cross Street, Ganapathy
                Nagar, Alapakkam, Porur, Tiruvallur,
                Tamilnadu-600 116.

                                                                                       Petitioner(s)
                                                              Vs
                1. The District Collector
                Tiruvallur District,
                Tiruvallur-602 001.

                2.Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board,
                4/66, Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur,
                Tamil Nadu-602 001.

                3.Deputy Director Public Health,
                47H, Tiruvallur, Thamaripakkam Rd,
                Ikkadu, Tamilnadu-602 001.

                4.Block Development Officer(BDO)
                Villivakkam Panjayat Union, Ambatur,
                Chennai-602 021.

                5.The Chairman Panchayat Union,


                1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 11:17:12 am )
                                                                                           WP No. 1891 of 2025



                Vanagaram, Panchayat Bard,
                Vanagaram, Chennai-600 095.

                                                                                           Respondent(s)
                PRAYER
                       Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying
                for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in
                proceedings No.3647/2022/ A6 dated on 13.06.2024 and quash the same and
                direct the 4th and 5th respondents to allow the balaji coffee shop to reinstate
                business activities.

                                  For Petitioner(s):       Mr.Rajkumar

                                  For Respondent(s):       Mr.M.Shajakhan, SGP for R1
                                                           Mr.V.Gunasekar, SC
                                                           for R2
                                                           Mr.E.Sundaram, GA
                                                           for R3
                                                           Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik
                                                           for R4
                                                           No appearance
                                                           for R5

                                                             ORDER

The above writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified th Mandamus, to call for the impugned order dated 13.06.2024, of the 4 th th respondent, to quash the same and to direct the 4 and 5 respondent to allow the balaji coffee shop to reinstate business activities. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 11:17:12 am ) WP No. 1891 of 2025

2. The petitioner was operating a small-scale coffee powder manufacturing unit named “BALAJI COFFEE CENTRE” operating at No.146/9, Sakthi Sainagar, 2nd Street, Ganapathi Nagar, Alampakkam, Porur, Chennai. The petitioner states that he obtained all appropriate licenses and clearances. Despite having complied with all the conditions, the petitioner received a notice from the 4th respondent on 13.06.2024, directing him to obtain additional NOC from the Health Department. Following the said notice, the 4th respondent sealed the petitioner's factory preventing further operations. Aggrieved by the impugned order and the sealing of the petitioner's premises, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition for the aforesaid relief.

3. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed on record.

4. When the matter is takenup for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted an affidavit stating that he has decided to close the coffee manufacturing unit and intends to restrict his business to retail selling of Coffee, Tea and Snacks etc. The learned counsel therefore submitted that the undertaking of the petitioner may be recorded and the writ petition be disposed of accordingly.

3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 11:17:12 am ) WP No. 1891 of 2025

5. The undertaking of the petitioner in paragraph 6, 7 and 8 of the affidavit reads as follows:

"6. I have sent Representation dated 21.04.2025 to the 4th Respondent informing him my willingness not to carryon business in the Roasting the Coffee seeds or to any other related business in the said premises. I requested him to consider my request remove the seal and open the premises. I have stated in the letter, I may be permitted to do retail business to sell Coffee, Tea and snacks also.

7. I filed this affidavit to affirm that I shall not carry of the business in the roasting the coffee seeds to make coffee powder in the said premises. I will not use Hp motors for that purpose.

8. I may be permitted to carry on Retail business to sell Coffee, Tea and Snacks in the premises. It is my livelihood and I am the sole bread winner for the family consists of aged parents, wife, school going daughter. I will comply with the any order passed by the Hon'ble court in the writ petition."

6. Recording the above undertaking, the writ petition is disposed of and a direction is issued to the 4th respondent to remove the seal of the premises at No.146/9, Sakthi Sainagar, 2nd Street, Ganapathi Nagar, Alampakkam, Porur, 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 11:17:12 am ) WP No. 1891 of 2025 Chennai. The 4th respondent shall not interfere with the petitioner's business, as long as it is restricted to retail business alone. In case, if the petitioner violates his undertaking, the 4th respondent is at liberty to take action against the petitioner in accordance with law. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

                dsn                                                                          16-07-2025
                Internet:Yes

                To

                1.The District Collector,

Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur-602 001.

2.The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, 4/66, Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu-602 001.

3.The Deputy Director Public Health, 47H, Tiruvallur, Thamaripakkam RD, Ikkadu, Tamilnadu-602 001.

4.The Block Development Officer(BDO) Villivakkam Panjayat Union, Ambatur, Chennai-602 021.

5.The Chairman Panchayat Union, Vanagaram, Panchayat Bard, Vanagaram, Chennai-600 095.

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 11:17:12 am ) WP No. 1891 of 2025 N.MALA J.

dsn WP No. 1891 of 2025 16-07-2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 11:17:12 am )